Frankly, once you've missed being "bombed" you develop a clear-cut aversion to the idea that bombers should be allowed to run loose.
How do you develop a clear cut test to separate potential bombers from ordinary citizens and prevent them from "running loose"? Lord forbid that in allowing citizens to 'run loose' we encourage mad bombers to do so.
Should we conservatives institute repressive laws on concealed weapons in order to insure that mad bombers can't run loose carrying? -- [or am I making a too-casual analysis of your ideas about the situation?]
I do not care to attempt to differentiate "potential bombers" from the real thing.
Yep, - its becoming apparent that you want repressive laws to control those 'running loose'..
Just catch 'em. Toss 'em in the clink. Throw away the key.
Hey, it worked for Stalin, so why not here?
No more Brent Kimberlins. Bombers should never be pardoned. Presidents who do pardon them should be flayed, flensed and cast into the fields for the wild dogs to eat. And that's just for starters!
Ya gotta love that authoritarian socialist mindset..
Frankly, it's pretty obvious you are trying to raise an argument where there is none, but if you want to step over the edge of the planet and start defending bombers, go right ahead. That'll put you in company with Algore and Billzo Clinton.