To: Arjun
Then when Nixon took over he conspired against India by trying to get closer to the Chinese.
You are too one-sided:
During his stint at the American embassy in New Delhi, Moynihan became known as a friend of India and continued to take a keen interest in the region even during his senate days. His daughter is also an Indophile and is known for her close ties to the country.
http://www.rediff.com/us/2003/mar/26ny.htm
Soon after Pat Moynihan had been appointed Ambassador to India by President Nixon, he learned that a vast sum of Indian rupees had accumulated in a US government account from the sale of American wheat to India. These "PB 484" fund, as they were called, could not be exchanged for dollars, but they could be used to purchase business-class air tickets. So Pat instituted what he called the "Star Series" through which the State Department would buy tickets for his friends willing to give lectures in India.
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/diary/moynihan.htm
As one friendly to your argument, I urge you to rachat it down a bit and smooth out the edges in your argumentation, if what you want to do is influence American opinion.
140 posted on
02/01/2006 11:10:28 AM PST by
kenavi
("Remember, your fathers sacrificed themselves without need of a messianic complex." Ariel Sharon)
To: kenavi
You have no sense of history. I dont care about changing your opinion.
141 posted on
02/01/2006 1:47:40 PM PST by
Arjun
(Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
To: kenavi
The important thing is not what a nice-guy ambassador had to SAY about India, but what Secretary of State Kissinger DID against India, in getting the US government not to help prevent the massacre of millions of Hindus in then-East Pakistan.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson