Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
It wasn't perceived, it was an unapologetic endorsement. It was incredibly courageous for the Mayor of liberal and statist St. Paul to put his neck on the line, and he paid for it.

Yep, and Bush has already been out once for Kennedy. Don't think that the Dems won't be quick to point that out.

18 posted on 01/28/2006 7:30:02 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Zeroisanumber

It may simply be better for Kennedy (and those candidates in more 'Rat-leaning states) to run their own races without bringing in the President (and in more GOP-leaning states, do the opposite). It's like the old LBJ tactic, he used to ask his Senators (in order for them to win reelection), "Do you need me to be for you or against you ?" Whichever position worked to get them elected was what would be used. You can technically run against the administration as a Republican without being a liberal, just trot out the old "I'll vote with 'em when they're right, and against 'em when they're wrong."


19 posted on 01/28/2006 7:40:49 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson