Skip to comments.
Dan Rather reports . . . on himself
LA Times ^
| January 28, 2006
| Lynn Smith
Posted on 01/28/2006 1:41:55 PM PST by WestTexasWend
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: WestTexasWend
"Fielding preselected audience questions" Would Rather cover an interview that required pre-selectecd questions?
21
posted on
01/28/2006 2:27:02 PM PST
by
Fido969
("Everybody out of the pool!")
To: Fido969
hehehe
Dan's "interview" of Saddam was pre-approved, I'm sure.
Not that it had to be, since they both blame Bush.
Libs have no problem censoring others, or being censored, when it's to their benefit.
Can anybody recall Hillary's last open press conference?
To: chae
When the Swiftboat vets stood up to Kerry and when freepers stood up to CBS, how come Rather cried like a little girl about it, when they were following his advice? Exactly, Dan has no problem kissing up to liberals of any kind, but he will lie and fight to completely destroy any conservative.
23
posted on
01/28/2006 2:41:07 PM PST
by
RJL
To: WestTexasWend
Can anybody recall Hillary's last open press conference?Her what?
24
posted on
01/28/2006 2:51:12 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
To: WestTexasWend
What journalism needs, Rather told the audience, is more: more backbone in questioning powerful leaders, more facts (and less speculation), more money and time from publishers, and more international coverage. Journalists, he said, must recognize that they have a duty and reconnect with their role in a system of checks and balances. "American journalism needs a spine transplant and we need it quickly," he said.>/i> LoL!
What the media needs is truth in broadcasting and to leave the political bias and twisting of the truth out of the picture.
You, Dan have shown to be the epitome of media bias and have no basis to show yourself to be the spokesperson for the directive of the MSM after your proved lack of media sense in the recent past.
25
posted on
01/28/2006 2:56:18 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: WestTexasWend
Rather thinks MSM is part of the government and that his ouster was an illegitimate political act.
26
posted on
01/28/2006 3:20:06 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
To: WestTexasWend
Obliquely referring to Rather's troubles, one member asked what role bloggers had played in his career. "Their influence was less than perceived," he said, equally obliquely. Some bloggers, he said, have found blogging to be "a good way to further a particular political agenda. It's not a crime," he said. But the public should recognize "there's a new opportunity here to manipulate public opinion." >.
"Some bloggers have found blogging to be "a good way to further a particular political agenda.....but I've found that cranking out fake documents is much more effective......and don't forget what the slickmeister taught us......if caught...deny..deny...deny.
Below is forged CBS document overlayed by Microsoft Word in default mode......courtesy Little Green Footballs..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: WestTexasWend
28
posted on
01/28/2006 7:12:39 PM PST
by
TChad
To: martin_fierro; dirtboy
29
posted on
01/28/2006 8:11:37 PM PST
by
Buckhead
To: Buckhead
!!!!!!!!Rollin' on the floor, Gaspin' for Breath!!!!!
You da Man!
30
posted on
01/30/2006 10:30:31 AM PST
by
FreedomFarmer
(Beyond the sidewalks, past the pavement, in the real America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson