Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fair Tax Solution for Ford, Delphi & American Manufacturing
The New Media Journal.US ^ | January 28, 2006 | Merrill Bender

Posted on 01/28/2006 1:15:41 PM PST by Eaglewatcher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-612 next last
A real life example of the benefits of the FairTax. Not intended to take management the unions or the government off the hook for the current mess. Just looking at a solution that is available.
1 posted on 01/28/2006 1:15:45 PM PST by Eaglewatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher

A crock.

How much tax do you think GM and Ford are going to pay with the losses they are running.

They aren't getting bankrupted by taxes, but by pension liabilities. (And to a lesser extent, health care liabilites).

If this is the way fair taxers think, you have to question everything they say.


2 posted on 01/28/2006 1:30:41 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

You made a good point, and didn't even know it.
How much are Ford and GM going to pay in taxes while running huge losses?
Zero.
How much FICA and income tax will be paid by the laid-off workers?
Zero.
How much will we spend on unemployment, health care and welfare benefits for these workers and their families?
Megabucks.

This is good for our country as a whole exactly how?

Wiser tax and trade laws would encourage manufacturers to locate here. Of course, efficient non-union businesses would still crush the union dinosaurs- but the jobs would stay in this country.
If Ford shuts down a plant, and Honda reopens it the next day with a fairly compensated non-union workforce, that's good for the country. And Honda will be forced to pay fair wages, or the best machinists and assemblers will go work for Toyota or Subaru.
If Ford shuts down a plant, the workers end up on welfare or in dead-end service jobs, and the plant is razed and the high-tech machinery sold to China, that is bad for the country as a whole.


3 posted on 01/28/2006 1:47:58 PM PST by Ostlandr ("In a mature society, the terms 'civil servant' and 'civil master' are semantically equal." -RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher

Suggest taxing the oil companies for their gluttony of profits to help out the auto industry since they're intertwined with each other.


4 posted on 01/28/2006 2:14:54 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr
And Honda will be forced to pay fair wages, or the best machinists and assemblers will go work for Toyota or Subaru.

Honda won't be forced to do anything. If the unemployed machinists don't want a job, they can just sit on their fat butts drawing those wonderful union benefits. The glut of available labor is going to depress wages. Thousands of applicants for tens of jobs puts the employer in control of compensation.

5 posted on 01/28/2006 2:19:53 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Last I knew we had a shortage of machinists, and a critical shortage of skilled, experienced machinists.

Gee, wouldn't it be terrible if the free market started determining wages, with the best employees getting the highest wages, and miserable, back-breaking jobs paying more than cushy ones?


6 posted on 01/28/2006 2:28:02 PM PST by Ostlandr ("In a mature society, the terms 'civil servant' and 'civil master' are semantically equal." -RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher
Supporters of a Legislative package commonly called the FairTax, point out that no other tax reform and replacement idea comes close to providing the economic benefits for American working families and the growth of American Manufacturing

What are you, smoking dope? American manufacturing LOSES MONEY. It doesn't pay income tax, BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE INCOME.

And since the Scam Tax, sorry - FairTax(tm) taxes consumption, manufacturers of consumer goods will bear a disproportionate burden of the ScamTax(tm).

But then again, logic is not a strong point for you guys.

7 posted on 01/28/2006 2:33:17 PM PST by Fido969 ("Everybody out of the pool!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
They aren't getting bankrupted by taxes, but by pension liabilities. (And to a lesser extent, health care liabilites).

Does anyone know any particulars about the pension/healthcare plan. I have heard that workers are able to retire at fairly early ages. Are they eligible for full pension at that time? Is their healthcare plan fully or nearly fully paid? Do they HAVE to go on Medicare at age 65, or do they have the option of staying on the company plan? I have a felling I know the answer to a lot of these questions and it is no wonder the companies are broke.

8 posted on 01/28/2006 2:44:39 PM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher; ancient_geezer; pigdog
Mr. Bender is spot on target across the board with this one!

Our current communist inspired tax system is monster killing our manufacturing base and far to few realize it. Mr. bender isn't amoung them obviously!

Great post!

9 posted on 01/28/2006 2:45:08 PM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher
From an American worker stand point, the key point is that the Fair Tax helps save American jobs and promotes American Manufacturing that stays on U.S. Soil. It allows American workers to take home an average 30% larger paycheck each and every week by eliminating any federal withholding for income tax or payroll tax from an American workers paycheck. American workers take home 100% of their paycheck!!

This is not true. The economic simulations of the FairTax plan assumed that workers would not keep all of their current pay, they would keep 100% of their new smaller pay. By far the largest tax revenues come from income and payroll taxes and only by eliminating these costs from businesses can manufacturers become more competitive.

See the thread below for more details rather than rehashing the whole misrepresentation which Boortz has admitted should have been written differently. There is no "Keep 100% of your current paycheck" with the FairTax unless prices go up about 18-20%.

See this thread:

JORGENSON EXPLODES FAIRTAX MYTH (FR Exclusive)
  Posted by RobFromGa
On News/Activism 08/25/2005 12:40:44 AM EDT · 702 replies · 9,117+ views


10 posted on 01/28/2006 2:51:59 PM PST by RobFromGa (Polls are for people who can't think for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr

Toyota and Nissan aren't about to re-open closed Ford or GM plants, nor will they be willing to hire the ex Ford or GM employees no matter what the tax policies are. (Honda, for some reason, is willing to build in unionized areas). So Nissan locates in Tennessee or Mississippi, and Toyota goes to Texas or Tennessee, the Koreans go to Alabama, but no one is going to want the Ford or GM plant in Atlanta, or any of the other factories that the dying companies are shutting down.

At this point, even protectionist duties aren't going to help the Americans.


11 posted on 01/28/2006 2:55:58 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Look who's talking about logic not being a strong point ... manufacturers are not taxed under the FairTax.


12 posted on 01/28/2006 3:23:47 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Look who's talking about logic not being a strong point ... manufacturers are not taxed under the FairTax.

They're not taxed under the "income tax" either, Einstein - BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANY INCOME.

13 posted on 01/28/2006 3:27:30 PM PST by Fido969 ("Everybody out of the pool!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Youf're still posting the link to your misleading vanity site which does not show what you claim it does. Workers pay will certainly go up greatly with the elimination of payroll taxes.

It's not The FairTax Book that has the misrepresentations - it's your vanity posts! You keep spewing your nonsense in your posts and that "stuff" has been repeatedly rebuffed by several FairTax supporters.


14 posted on 01/28/2006 3:30:15 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PAR35; Taxman; ancient_geezer; Principled; EternalVigilance; rwrcpa1; phil_will1; kevkrom; ...

One of the reason that the companies that export are running at a loss is that their export prices are higner than they need to be bec ause of the income tax component that is embedded in the prices of things going to other countries.

This is one of the things the FairTax helps to correct.


15 posted on 01/28/2006 3:34:30 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pigdog

I want to be on record - I strongly support this legislation. I need to start writing some letters on this. I'm right in the middle of a move, but when I get done - I need to get on it!


16 posted on 01/28/2006 3:45:41 PM PST by Raffus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Companies that don't have any income have a problem that the fair tax can't solve. They should go out of business and be replaced by companies that do have income. The fair tax wouldn't be a hindrance on viable companies like the income tax is.


17 posted on 01/28/2006 3:48:39 PM PST by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pigdog

You have proven repeatedly that you are not mentally equipped to understand this legislation and I have no intention of rehashing the same old discussion with you. The record is already there on the previous threads.

I happen to be one of those people who knows that this FairTax has no chance of getting passed since it is a big lie, so I am not spending any time worrying about discussing it again. I'm just pointing out to any new people thinking about jumping on the FairTax band wagon that there are major flaws in the way it is being sold, including in this article which perpetuates the "Keep 100% of your paycheck" Free Lunch myth which has been totally exposed as wrong even by Boortz himself.


18 posted on 01/28/2006 3:51:12 PM PST by RobFromGa (Polls are for people who can't think for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Raffus

That'd be great ... please do so. And encourage others to do that, too! Every single bit of input helps.


19 posted on 01/28/2006 3:51:17 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
I need to get more involved in politics in Maine where I'm moving. A blue state, but there are some patriots there. I absolutely abhor Vermont. I'm sooooooooooooo out of Vermont. Good riddance!

I'll have to start by writing the RINO senators of ME.
20 posted on 01/28/2006 3:55:26 PM PST by Raffus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-612 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson