Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Hal

Agreed. It made sense for the Dems to nominate Kerry in 2004 because he represents the Dem view perfectly, and there really wasn't anyone who had any chance of beating Bush anyway. Now that they have a chance to win, they'd be crazy to waste their vote on someone who can't win just because he represents their views.


25 posted on 01/28/2006 10:06:42 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

DON"T tell them that! You do not tell a traitorous, stupid, commie animal who is peeing in his pants that he is standing on a live wire. You pop a beer and watch the show...


44 posted on 01/28/2006 10:13:09 AM PST by jonascord ("As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
Agreed. It made sense for the Dems to nominate Kerry in 2004 because he represents the Dem view perfectly, and there really wasn't anyone who had any chance of beating Bush anyway. Now that they have a chance to win, they'd be crazy to waste their vote on someone who can't win just because he represents their views.

Don't forget one biggie...the clintons didn't want anyone running in 2004 who could win the WH. That would have upset their apple cart!

81 posted on 01/28/2006 10:35:56 AM PST by top 2 toe red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson