I WASN'T attacking anyone. I was challenging them to consider their motives. I would think a conservative could see that for what it is: an attempt to HELP keep people [whom I care about] from going off the deep end.
Again, I say to you, who died and made you Psychologist-in-Chief? You are speaking to a community of seasoned activists with a mean age of 40 who have responsible positions in real life, unlike yourself, whose "charges" (your word) are subsidized by their parents. We have real responsibilities. You continue to insist you know better than us when your earlier post admitted you had never heard of the seriously treasonous activities of our opponents in this situation.
How old are you, may I ask?
See my FReepmail to you for my frank opinion of your display of ignorance on this thread.
Pardon me just a minute...
I know all the people I've been Freeping with at WRAMC, and we all possess well-developed critical thinking skills; it's more than a wee bit insulting to have somebody without personal knowledge of the people he's talking about, to jump onto a thread and insinuate that we are so stupid that in the past ten-plus months we haven't already considered our motives WRT our WRAMC Freeps.
And it's much more than insulting to offer talk-show style psychological diagnoses based solely on the comments posted on FR.
Don't you have some papers to grade, or something?