The break-even point for getting oil from tar sand is estimated around $30/bbl, oil shale is $40/bbl. Coal can be converted to gasoline as well. Why don't we see it happening more? Because for all of these, the big cost is up-front capital cost, and investors are not going to put up the money unless they are sure that oil prices will stay stably above $40/bbl. And we know that OPEC will crash the price of oil (bankrupting the operations) as soon as it sees investment occuring heavily.
So a variable tariff that sets a floor of $40/bbl would allow investors to predict a demand for oil substitutes at a price point that makes investment worthwhile
" The break-even point for getting oil from tar sand is estimated around $30/bbl, oil shale is $40/bbl. Coal can be converted to gasoline as well. Why don't we see it happening more? Because for all of these, the big cost is up-front capital cost, and investors are not going to put up the money unless they are sure that oil prices will stay stably above $40/bbl. And we know that OPEC will crash the price of oil (bankrupting the operations) as soon as it sees investment occuring heavily.
So a variable tariff that sets a floor of $40/bbl would allow investors to predict a demand for oil substitutes at a price point that makes investment worthwhile"
Yes, that is my thinking as well. The floor makes sure the investment works.
This is classic protectionism, something I normally oppose, but I will make an exception when the foreign producers are oil dictatorships growing fat on our oil dependency.