Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: R W Reactionairy

I find the prospect of $262 a barrel oil somewhat ludicrous in any case. Even if the world production were cut to 1/4, the price would not rise 4x. It might spike that high, but the collapse of economies around the world would cut demand so the price would rise to maybe 2x, that is, $130. That is as far as it would go longterm since the alternatives would be brought online as quickly as possible, 5-7 years, and the price of oil would then be held to $130 by lack of demand for expensive oil. Also, the possibility of general war would kick in at that point and there would be next to zero civilian oil demand. All oil aside from necessary civilian use would go to the military.


432 posted on 01/29/2006 4:26:14 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
"I find the prospect of $262 a barrel oil somewhat ludicrous in any case. Even if the world production were cut to 1/4, the price would not rise 4x. It might spike that high, but the collapse of economies around the world would cut demand ...[continues]"

Agreed in principle, although where the equilibrium point based on demand destruction might be I would not venture a guess. Too bad this thread got revved up initially based on the comments of that goof ball Soros.

435 posted on 01/29/2006 4:42:33 PM PST by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Monihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson