Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
She should have a court case.

No physician should be required to perform an abortion, and no pharmacist should be required to dispense abortificents. If enough refused on professional, ethical, and moral grounds, Roe v. Wade would largely be a dead letter even if SCOTUS never overturned it.

At a minimum, abortion--even if legal--should not be easy to get. There should be moral, ethical, and professional hurdles in the way.

201 posted on 01/27/2006 9:26:03 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles
Based on what? She didn't like the rules, legal ones BTW, of her employer?

No physician should be required to perform an abortion, and no pharmacist should be required to dispense abortificents.

No one is saying they should be required to. However if they choose to work for a private corporation that decides to engage in legal activity, they are required to follow those rules.

Unless like most 'conservatives' you believe private corporations don't have a right to conduct their business as they see fit.

241 posted on 01/28/2006 6:44:57 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson