Skip to comments.
Target Pharmacist Fired for Refusing to Dispense Abortifacient Morning-After Pill
Life Site News ^
| 1/27/06
| Terry Vanderheyden
Posted on 01/27/2006 12:56:47 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-295 next last
She argues that to refer patients to a dispensary where they can find them is equally immoral. I just cant be a link in the chain at all, Williams said. She lost her job because the left only wants religious freedom to extend to those who despise religion.
1
posted on
01/27/2006 12:56:50 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Mr. Silverback; Coleus; cpforlife.org
2
posted on
01/27/2006 12:58:09 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
There are other pharmacist jobs out there. Screw Target.
3
posted on
01/27/2006 12:58:10 PM PST
by
Nachum
To: wagglebee
Good luck with the EEOC filing. My wife was fired in writing without cause after years of good service for telling her boss she was pregnant. We lost in a suit to reclaim back wages and cost of insurance for child.
To: NYer; Salvation; narses
5
posted on
01/27/2006 12:59:26 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
I just cant be a link in the chain at all,
Then find a different line of work.
To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
That's an utterly foolish reply.
7
posted on
01/27/2006 1:04:02 PM PST
by
kimmie7
(As of January 23, I've been smoke free 11 MONTHS!)
To: odoso; animoveritas; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; Unam Sanctam; EdReform; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping List.DISCUSSION ABOUT: "Target Pharmacist Fired for Refusing to Dispense Abortifacient Morning-After Pill"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FreepMail either MillerCreek or wagglebee.
8
posted on
01/27/2006 1:04:12 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
the Target store where she worked has never stocked Plan B.So why didn't she say "We don't carry that prescription. Please try another pharmacy." Sounds like she brought it on herself.
To: Nachum
If she had been working there before Target began selling "morning after" pills, essentially they added an unforeseen requirement which contradicts her religion, and she would seem to have a very strong basis for a lawsuit. She has invested in a career at Target, and there is damages done by having to start over at a new location.
What makes the actions of the governor so profoundly evil is that it prevents the workings of a free market. Sure, an employer has the right to tell an employee what to do, providing that the requirements do not create an adverse change in the working environment. An employee is free to seek work elsewhere, so the employer loses a potential asset in the employee, and his competitor gains an asset; this is how free market pressures would have solved the race problem in the South once unconstitutional laws were removed: it's bad business to drive good employees or customers away.
What Blogojevich has done is to make pharmacists have reason to fear accomodating a pro-life employee.
10
posted on
01/27/2006 1:05:25 PM PST
by
dangus
To: wagglebee
God, Bless her for her stand.
11
posted on
01/27/2006 1:05:42 PM PST
by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
I just cant be a link in the chain at all, Then find a different line of work.
I assume that by your logic it would be okay for physicians to be required to perform abortions?
12
posted on
01/27/2006 1:06:21 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Nachum
Pharmacists are one of the highest demand jobs in the country. She can get another job tomorrow.
13
posted on
01/27/2006 1:07:59 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: wagglebee
I eagerly await walking into a bookstore only to have the clerk tell me she won't sell me the book I want because it offends his/her beliefs.
14
posted on
01/27/2006 1:10:24 PM PST
by
gdani
To: kimmie7
I just cant be a link in the chain at all,
Then find a different line of work.
"That's an utterly foolish reply."
No actually it's not.
15
posted on
01/27/2006 1:11:44 PM PST
by
swmobuffalo
(the only good terrorist is a dead one)
To: gdani
I eagerly await walking into a bookstore only to have the clerk tell me she won't sell me the book I want because it offends his/her beliefs. That is a very flawed line of thinking.
A book doesn't directly lead to stopping a human life. You need to understand that disagreeing with a belief is very different from refusing to participate in a process which violates your beliefs.
16
posted on
01/27/2006 1:14:49 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
go back to the baby-killing DU.
To: gdani
I eagerly await walking into a bookstore only to have the clerk tell me she won't sell me the book I want because it offends his/her beliefs.
What an odd thing to eagerly await. Not selling you a book is morally equivalent to not helping you kill your unborn child?
To: kimmie7
That's an utterly foolish reply. Not really. People don't really seem to grasp how ridiculous these people are acting. What if a pharmacist in, I don't know..., California doesn't want to dispense Zocor or Plavix (life saving cardiovascular drugs) because it is against their religion to support the corporation that makes those drugs. In America, with freedom of religion, whatever you want can be your religion.
To: swmobuffalo; kimmie7
I just cant be a link in the chain at all, Then find a different line of work.
"That's an utterly foolish reply."
No actually it's not.
Yes it is. If a physician was required to perform abortions there would be outrage -- this is no different at all.
20
posted on
01/27/2006 1:17:14 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-295 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson