Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Cheers for the Bush Doctrine
Time Magazine ^ | May 27, 2005 | CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

Posted on 01/27/2006 11:38:40 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright

Jon Stewart, the sage of Comedy Central, is one of the few to be honest about it. "What if Bush ... has been right about this all along? I feel like my world view will not sustain itself and I may ... implode." Daniel Schorr, another critic of the Bush foreign policy, ventured, a bit more grudgingly, that Bush "may have had it right."

Right on what? That America, using power harnessed to democratic ideals, could begin a transformation of the Arab world from endless tyranny and intolerance to decent governance and democratization. Two years ago, shortly before the invasion of Iraq, I argued in these pages that forcefully deposing Saddam Hussein was, more than anything, about America "coming ashore" to effect a "pan-Arab reformation"--a dangerous, "risky and, yes, arrogant" but necessary attempt to change the very culture of the Middle East, to open its doors to democracy and modernity.

The Administration went ahead with this great project knowing it would be hostage to history. History has begun to speak. Elections in Afghanistan, a historic first. Elections in Iraq, a historic first. Free Palestinian elections producing a moderate leadership, [emphasis mine] two historic firsts. Municipal elections in Saudi Arabia, men only, but still a first. In Egypt, demonstrations for democracy--unheard of in decades--prompting the dictator to announce free contested presidential elections, a historic first.

(Excerpt) Read more at jmm.aaa.net.au ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: ageofliberty; arabworld; blowback; bushdoctrine; democracy; hubris; krauthammer; praise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: oneofmany

Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.


21 posted on 01/27/2006 12:46:53 PM PST by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

>>>I argued in these pages that forcefully deposing Saddam Hussein was, more than anything, about America "coming ashore" to effect a "pan-Arab reformation"--a dangerous, "risky and, yes, arrogant" but necessary attempt to change the very culture of the Middle East, to open its doors to democracy and modernity.<<<

Oh, yes, that was all your idea Krauthammer...


22 posted on 01/27/2006 1:04:49 PM PST by LEPEN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
This is kind of long but I hope you'll read on.......and it's a factor that needs to be considered when discussing what just happened in these elections. There's no doubt that we will all be holding our breath while we watch but here's a view that hasn't really been discussed yet.

The Palestinians and much of the middle east have become accustomed to a system of pay for loyalty which I like to call "palm face up" Saudi Arabia wouldn't exist today if it weren't for that part......And there is a fine Hollywood example of that fact illustrated in Laurence of Arabia in the scene right after he crossed the desert with Omar Shariff.....Anthony Quinn plays a a Bedouin who is "A river to his people" ....translation.... his people will follow him as long as they continue to receive payment in booty from their raiding parties on the Turkish trains etc., etc.

The Corruption of the Palestinian process by Arafat follows that exact tradition.....and it was exposed when he died and new leadership discovered the Billion Dollars Yasser squirreled away in a Bank account outside of beloved Palestine. How do you think his lovely wife was able to live in Paris in the High Style to which she had become accustomed and thank god she didn't produce a Male Heir.

Hamas didn't expect to win but I'm Glad they did because now they can't hide behind Fattah and claim innocence. We now have full transparency so long as Fattah refuses to join the coalition.......Hamas is in charge and the West is about to pull their Billion dollar welfare check because of the Freedom Fighters who now represent the Palestinian people....

I say good.......Now we'll get to see how long the honeymoon will last between them when Hamas fails to follow through with all their promises and you can bet there have been many made......The people are restless and their patients is growing short.......

Now we'll see just how benevolent the rest of Islam really is about their beloved Palestinian brothers!........will the handouts be forthcoming?.......or will they do what they have always done with the Palestinians since their exodus into the various Arab countries........which is to throw just enough scrapes from their tables to keep from getting bitten by the dog.

When all of this washes out Fattah and/or more reasonable Palestinians will be in charge because Hamas will hang themselves with their own rope and their armor won't be as shiny as it first appeared.

23 posted on 01/27/2006 1:09:56 PM PST by thingumbob (Democracy is the best defense against terrorist/communist thugs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
"Islamists coming to power is NOT a bad thing. Gather your enemy in one place and kill them."

It also makes for a clear enemy in a conventional war.

No more pretending...the enemy is now Palestine vis a vis their openly terrorist government.

Israel...take your first clear shot.

24 posted on 01/27/2006 1:15:41 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ziggygrey

I see the election of Hamas as a step toward conventional war, and that's a good thing.

I'd rather have terrorists at the helm in Iran, than a terrorist-supporting government pretending to persecute terrorists while actively funding and hiding them.

The wolves of conventional war are howling louder and louder.


25 posted on 01/27/2006 1:19:21 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

I agree with much of what you said. I don't think this is such a bad thing. There is nowhere for the apologists to hide any longer (but I'm sure they'll still try).


26 posted on 01/27/2006 2:14:47 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

The election provides further support for our intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan and, as it turns out, none too soon.


27 posted on 01/27/2006 3:49:25 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

And your reason for 7 month old article is ...????

The first elections *last year* in Palestine *did* produce a result of more accomodating leadership. It also was corrupt.

The Gaza pullout and Fatah corruption and other factors helped Hamas politically. This doesnt make CK's main point less valid, which is that democracy is an agent of change for the better in the Arab world. What we see in Palestine is a fanaticism that is absent in other places. Obviously the Islamist agenda has won there. For Now. But it's a flawed and failed ideology that will implode on itself now that it is given the responsibility of governing instead of merely the change to wreak havoc.

An 'elected' terrorist leadership of palestine only gives us more clarity and honesty about what Palestinians really want and how realistic peace really is. Even better, the Government is on the hook to deliver for their people. If it retains terrorism as its mode of operation, it will fail. We lived with the farce of the PA 'trying' to stop terrorism. Hamas was bad cop, PA 'good cop' - we were suckers.

On balance, Arab democracy is a very good thing for us and for the world. The governments can no longer hide behind the excuses about the 'arab street' and the people can no longer claim they are powerless to make change.

If palestinians want war, then war it shall be.


28 posted on 01/27/2006 6:44:35 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Time Magazine???

Yep. He does contribute to TIME Magazine.

29 posted on 01/28/2006 5:42:09 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

This article appeared there but I couldn't find a direct link.


30 posted on 01/28/2006 9:03:56 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

It's right at the bottom of the page this thread is linked to.


31 posted on 01/29/2006 7:50:46 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson