[Antonello]

I disagree. It appears that what you have problems with is the Constitutional right to free speech. You have a legal right to buy the house next door to me and paint it orange with purple polka dots. I would then have the right criticize you and your paint choices without being opposed to property rights.

Here, Ford has a right to restrict parking in their lot, and I have a right to point out how stupid it is as a business decision, and to translate that disdain into a purchasing decision.

I have no problem with your Constitutional right to freely display your lack of support for owner's rights. Do you have a problem with being labeled as such as a consequence to what you express?

[Chena]

I have no problem with your Constitutional right to freely display your lack of support for owner's rights. Do you have a problem with being labeled as such as a consequence to what you express?

How do you figure the comment was a "lack of support for owner's rights".

An opinion is an opinion, nothing more, nothing less. I don't think folks are saying Ford shouldn't have the RIGHT to make this new rule, some (including myself) are just saying that they believe the new parking rules are rather silly, perhaps unfair, and not a good business move.