To: Antonello
Maybe this one question quiz will help in thinking about the issue a little:
1. Bob paints his house pink. Which of the following people could be considered anti-property rights?
a. Cindy tells bob she hates it
b. Matt stops inviting bob to his parties, and tells everyone how stupid Bob is for painting his house and ugly color.
c. Steve goes to city hall to file a complaint.
d. Eric paints his house green in retaliation because he knows Bob hates green.
e. all of the above
(answer c)
To: On the Road to Serfdom
You seem to not be recognizing the difference between 'supporting', 'acknowledging', and 'opposing' property rights.
I am saying that expressing an objection to a decision because of personal opinions can still allow acknowledgment of the right, but displays a lack of support of the owner to make that decision as he sees fit.
You appear to believe that anything short of an attempt to strip the rights from an owner is support. By that logic, a Jesse Jackson boycott over a perceived (or even manufactured) injustice still qualifies as support for the target's rights.
152 posted on
01/27/2006 1:18:38 PM PST by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: On the Road to Serfdom
Don't agree in all cases.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson