Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antonello

Maybe this one question quiz will help in thinking about the issue a little:

1. Bob paints his house pink. Which of the following people could be considered “anti-property rights”?
a. Cindy tells bob she hates it
b. Matt stops inviting bob to his parties, and tells everyone how stupid Bob is for painting his house and ugly color.
c. Steve goes to city hall to file a complaint.
d. Eric paints his house green in retaliation because he knows Bob hates green.
e. all of the above



(answer c)


150 posted on 01/27/2006 12:57:27 PM PST by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: On the Road to Serfdom
You seem to not be recognizing the difference between 'supporting', 'acknowledging', and 'opposing' property rights.

I am saying that expressing an objection to a decision because of personal opinions can still allow acknowledgment of the right, but displays a lack of support of the owner to make that decision as he sees fit.

You appear to believe that anything short of an attempt to strip the rights from an owner is support. By that logic, a Jesse Jackson boycott over a perceived (or even manufactured) injustice still qualifies as support for the target's rights.
152 posted on 01/27/2006 1:18:38 PM PST by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: On the Road to Serfdom

Don't agree in all cases.


166 posted on 01/27/2006 2:16:29 PM PST by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson