Skip to comments.
57% back a hit on Iran if defiance persists
LA Times ^
| 27 Jan 2006
| Greg Miller
Posted on 01/27/2006 8:00:41 AM PST by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: robowombat
This is priceless. Priceless.
2
posted on
01/27/2006 8:01:51 AM PST
by
Peach
To: robowombat
Well, I wonder is Mr. Schumer has seen this poll. After all, he and his colleagues reside in the "mainstream" of American thought and customs, don't they?
3
posted on
01/27/2006 8:02:16 AM PST
by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
To: robowombat
Those that opposed the invasion in Iraq have to consider what our position would today if we had to move on Iran with Sadaam Hussein still in power.
To: robowombat
5
posted on
01/27/2006 8:04:57 AM PST
by
oxcart
(Remember Bush lied.......People DYED... THEIR FINGERS! (M. Steyn))
To: robowombat
Right... the Democrats will be for the strike before they're against it.
6
posted on
01/27/2006 8:06:15 AM PST
by
Lexington Green
(I'd rather have Jihadis in front of me than Democrats behind me.)
To: robowombat
Moving on to more important matters, we now know exactly where the blood spatters were in the cruise ship cabin of the missing fiance
7
posted on
01/27/2006 8:07:21 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Semper Paratus
Those that opposed the invasion in Iraq have to consider what our position would today if we had to move on Iran with Saddam Hussein still in power. But that would require thinking, which is a terrible burden on those that have eschewed thinking for feeling.
8
posted on
01/27/2006 8:07:26 AM PST
by
A message
To: paul51
9
posted on
01/27/2006 8:08:21 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: robowombat
I am starting to have faith in Americans again.
To: SF Republican
11
posted on
01/27/2006 8:10:20 AM PST
by
Flavius
(Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: robowombat
57% now. I would like to know what the percentage would be after the shooting starts? I believe that only 35% of Americans are true Patriots! I would guess that we would have no more than 45% of the American people backing our forces once the bombs start to fall.
12
posted on
01/27/2006 8:10:43 AM PST
by
2001convSVT
("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
To: robowombat
Freepers who went on about Americans not supporting military action please take note. I suspect there have been very few times in our history when Americans did not support war at the time it is initiated. And this one is still just in the run up.
What the American people would like to see is a total conquest of the Iranian regime. Americans view Iran (and probably Saudi Arabia) as the source of Islamic terrorism and fundamentalism.
If you want to calm Iraq and most of the Middle East, neutralize Iran and Syria.
13
posted on
01/27/2006 8:14:53 AM PST
by
Williams
To: robowombat
A right to nukes
The recent call for sanctions against Iran in reaction to its restarted nuclear program is incredibly hypocritical (Jan. 23). Why are the United States, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom allowed to possess nuclear energy while Iran is denied the same right? I understand the fear that Iran might produce nuclear weapons, yet all the nations seeking sanctions against Iran possess nuclear weapons of their own. If we are going to demand that Iran not have a nuclear weapons program, we should dismantle our nuclear arsenal as well.
If we are so concerned about nuclear weapons in the Middle East, why have we rejected the Egyptian and Saudi call "that the whole Middle East - including Israel - be declared a nuclear-free zone" (Jan. 17)? Is it any surprise that Iran would want to develop nuclear weapons when Israel possesses such weapons and is capable of reaching Iran with them?
If we want to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weaponry, the first step is to disarm the nuclear arsenals of the nations Iran most fears - Israel and the United States.
Ross Kleinstuber Newark, Del.
From a letter to the editor in the Philadelphia Inquirer. I wonder how many letters they had to sift through to get to one that echos their view.
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/13721979.htm
14
posted on
01/27/2006 8:14:58 AM PST
by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: sportutegrl
The language of the letter in the Philly chessewrapper signed by Mr. Kleinsturbater appears to be almost word for word the same text I have seen printer here from a private investment tip paper and from another'opinion' piece in another rag which I cannot recall its name. These bilge is coming from some liberal sewage dissemination site. Anti-war.com perhaps?
To: paul51
But have they confirmed that it's Smith's blood??
16
posted on
01/27/2006 8:23:35 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: sportutegrl
Ross Kleinstuber lives in a make-believe world. Idealism over realism is, in effect, the quickest route to failure.
17
posted on
01/27/2006 8:24:09 AM PST
by
L98Fiero
To: robowombat
some respondents said they believed Iran posed a more serious threat than Saddam Hussein's Iraq did.I think we all know that Saddam's Iraq would be right where Iran is today if he had not been toppled.
57% would support military action against Iran? Today? Well, we also know just about how far that percentage would drop when the going got tough. The weaklings would come out of the woodwork again.
18
posted on
01/27/2006 8:30:29 AM PST
by
daybreakcoming
(May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
To: sarasota
But have they confirmed that it's Smith's blood??That question is good for another 30 shows
19
posted on
01/27/2006 8:39:39 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: robowombat
Despite persistent disillusionment with the war in Iraq, a majority of Americans supports taking military action against Iran if that country continues to produce material that can be used to develop nuclear weapons.......... Thanks to the left-wing media and the Democrats, half of the American public has no stomach for a ground war.
However, most of America still LOVES a good air war.
20
posted on
01/27/2006 8:44:31 AM PST
by
Polybius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson