Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS

No, you're assuming again.

I have no problem with instant deportation for any suspect that cannot produce ID within a reasonable amount of time, asset forfeiture by Illegals and their employers, police SHOULD detain all Illegals they come in contact with for deportation, and I am in favor of holding sanctuary municipalities liable for injury/damage inflicted upon taxpaying Americans by the Illegal criminals they harbor.

But let's be realistic. Since most of our elected officials and LEA's don't want to even ask if you're an Illegal, let alone enforce the law. Don't you think we may be better served at trying to keep more from coming before we start weeding the garden?


105 posted on 01/27/2006 2:13:33 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward

"Don't you think we may be better served at trying to keep more from coming before we start weeding the garden?"

The current fencing is forcing the druggies underground and the illegal workers into the desert, yet many here think that this security would be enhanced more by turning the U.S. into an armed camp.

I disagree.

By leaving the "prize" at the end and simply making the journey harder we guarantee the conflict will continue.

When there is nothing to gain by coming here illegally, they will stop coming.

Are sections of fence needed ? Sure, with our population expanding along the border the criminal element must be detered from crossing to plunder, then run back. Is a "DMZ" necessary to accomplish this ? I think not.


107 posted on 01/27/2006 2:41:36 PM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson