Come on, man, now you're parsing words. It amounts to the same thing.
Reading a biography of someone leads you to think she has "normal sensibilities" which means you KNOW what she was crying about?
Come on, man. Pull the article and rework it as an opinion piece. Show the integrity you are capable of, and the integrity we demand of the MSM.
I mean, if the New York Times ever wrote "President Bush was angry about a question about Iraq, obviously because he was once an oil man and was thinking about how much money he lost," we'd be all over them. You're doing the same thing.
But you folks do what you want, I'm done with this thread. The hysterics on one side and the stubbornness on the other are getting me depressed.
>>>Come on, man. Pull the article and rework it as an opinion piece. Show the integrity you are capable of, and the integrity we demand of the MSM.<<<
It already is an opinion piece.