[FairOpinion]

"But first off, FairOpinion is NOT a schill. And the personal ad hominems and gang-bang attacks on this board against FO are truly obscene at times. Disgusting. And reveal more about the person posting them than scores any great "ideologic" or "intelligent" points."

====

Excellent post and thanks for coming to my defense. The only reason they call me a shill, so as to use misdirection, like magician, except that they are sorely lacking in the magician's skills. They are way too transparent. And they can't stand when I point out the obvious, that doing things that helps the Dem agenda and helps leftist, socialist Dems get elected is NOT a conservative position.

[NormsRevenge]

You need a defender, imo, you don't have an ability to carry your own arguments , quite frankly.

You don't seem to care or are reluctant to discuss LGBT issues much less the appointments of so many gays and greens to critical positions under the Gub.

Those are all the fault of conservatives too, I'm sure , it's in your script the CA GOP faxes ya daily.

You and others here seek to make it personal as you can't argue the issues.. nor debate the facts of what we are confronted with, never kiss a Trpjan Gift Horse, he may move in with ya and then what ya gonna do?

[calcowgirl]

I believe I have referred to you as a shill (if not, I have certainly thought it). I base it on the fact that you post much inaccurate information on these threads, and when corrected, rarely bother to acknowledge those mistakes but instead come back another day to post the same, or similar, misinformation. Always, this information seems to be favorable to either the CA GOP or Schwarzenegger, hence my conclusion that you were shilling for one of them, or a related group.

I offer but a few examples (Check the post, and the replies refuting the statements):

Riordan and Villaraigosa:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565057/posts?page=37#37

Arnold "resturcturing debt", not "new debt":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1273689/posts?page=9#9

Arnold doing 8 out of 10 things "right" so in the "overall score Arnold is way ahead"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1414618/posts?page=41#41

"Republicans are united in supporting Prop. 76"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1511120/posts?page=46#46

Here's a classic misrepresentation. After reinforcing another's post about "Tom McClintock's YES vote for domestic partners to gain the same property tax advantage as married couples on the transfer of property, SCA 9," you repost the link and and further flame the anti-McClintock fire and pumping up Arnold. HOWEVER, all one had to do was click on the link to see that McClintock's vote for SCA 9 had nothing to do with domestic partnerships or property, but dealt with the State Transportation Fund.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/990737/posts?page=238#238

That post also contained this classic: "...Arnold is at least as good about the fiscal issues, as Tom, but he can actually get elected."

[Alia]

Of course I would come to your defense; I find their constant barrage of disgusting abuse directed at you to be offensive. You are not saying anything the vast majority of voters in CA, Repub and Dem, aren't saying, and voting in CA. I've been involved in lots of campaigns in CA which had a "real" conservative running for office, and they NEVER won. We loved these men, dearly. And then we realized, we needed a newer approach to winning, and rebuilding CA.

that doing things that helps the Dem agenda and helps leftist, socialist Dems get elected is NOT a conservative position.

Bears repeating. Learned this first-hand and up-close time after time.