To: PatrickHenry
Good article.
Looks like the soft sciences (biology, genetics, etc.) are taking over from the hard sciences (paleontology, geology, etc.).
At least paleontologists, geologists and archaeologists aren't afraid of getting their hands dirty!
13 posted on
01/26/2006 12:12:09 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
Biology isn't a soft science. Just squishy. It's not as austere as physics and astronomy, but I regard it as one of the "hard sciences."
15 posted on
01/26/2006 12:13:56 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: Coyoteman
"At least paleontologists, geologists and archaeologists aren't afraid of getting their hands dirty! Neither do farmers.
Don't ask me, I don't know...
49 posted on
01/26/2006 2:04:50 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: Coyoteman
Looks like the soft sciences (biology, genetics, etc.) are taking over from the hard sciences (paleontology, geology, etc.).All of what you mention are Nerf sciences. Hard sciences are physics, computer science, etc.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson