Skip to comments.
Public schools looking at Bible literacy class
Yahoo!News ^
| January 26, 2006
| Mike Linn
Posted on 01/26/2006 10:41:14 AM PST by mlc9852
High schools across the nation are considering an elective course in Bible literacy. That's pitting advocates of church-state separation against proponents of the class who say their mission is purely scholarly.
Lawmakers in Alabama and Georgia in the past few weeks have introduced legislation clearing the way for their high schools to offer the course, which is based on the textbook The Bible and Its Influence.
The book's publisher, the Fairfax, Va.-based Bible Literacy Project, says about 300 school districts are considering the course, which covers the Old Testament, followed by both Jews and Christians, and the New Testament, the story of Jesus and his disciples.
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: biblestudy; hseducation; religiouseducation
1
posted on
01/26/2006 10:41:15 AM PST
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
Well, it IS the best seller of all time...
2
posted on
01/26/2006 10:43:13 AM PST
by
RedBeaconNY
(Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
To: RedBeaconNY
And if you are ever on Jeopardy, the knowledge may come in handy.
3
posted on
01/26/2006 10:44:11 AM PST
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
My Goodness...you can't do that.Sure,they should read Das Kapital...but the Bible??????????
(end sarcasm)
To: mlc9852
You can't study western literature without a knowledge of the Bible. Or without a knowledge of Greek mythology. While I knew little about Greek mythology, I knew my Bible and it helped me immensely in college English classes. Several other students--non-religous--told me that they envied that knowledge. Knowledge about God and the Bible is not the same as knowing God personally. THAT type of instruction would be a violation of church and state. Allow Bible literacy in the classroom.
5
posted on
01/26/2006 10:46:14 AM PST
by
twigs
To: Gay State Conservative
It's quite amusing what they want kids to read in school these days but get all bent out of shape that they might read the Bible.
6
posted on
01/26/2006 10:47:13 AM PST
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
LAAAAAAAAAAaawwd have MERCY!!! ** {8^{Q~
They's gonna be a lotta wet bloomers all knotted up down at the NEA and the ACLU over this!
Y'all thought Gen'l Sherman was a B!#@h??
Just wait 'till those two venomous gangs get done with ya!!
Lots of luck and Divine intervention, folks; yer gonna need it!
7
posted on
01/26/2006 10:49:26 AM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
(Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
To: mlc9852
Maybe they should start with basic literacy classes.
8
posted on
01/26/2006 10:49:56 AM PST
by
MortMan
(There is no substitute for victory.)
To: MortMan
By the time they're in high school, it's a little late.
9
posted on
01/26/2006 10:50:42 AM PST
by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
By the time they're in high school, it's a little late.
It's never too late. As long as someone still draws breath in his lungs, it's not too late.
10
posted on
01/26/2006 10:56:37 AM PST
by
JamesP81
To: mlc9852
Yes, but even small gains would be an improvement, right?
11
posted on
01/26/2006 10:56:37 AM PST
by
MortMan
(There is no substitute for victory.)
To: mlc9852
I'm guessing that the liberal-run public education system will welcome the opportunity to bash, question and otherwise denigrate sacred scripture.
12
posted on
01/26/2006 11:01:11 AM PST
by
TChris
("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
To: mlc9852
As an elective course, I think it's a great idea.
13
posted on
01/26/2006 11:03:04 AM PST
by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To be honest i'm not so sure if I want the public schools teaching the bible. I'd imagine by the time the teachers unions and administrators were done with their curriculum, the messages the students would be getting about the bible would be pretty off-base. I don't want government schools teaching my kid religion. I can do that myself.
To: Uncle Jaque
This program was in my son's school in the 90's and is nothing new. It's a widely used course. Frankly, I'm surprised this has taken so long. I do know that many school boards, especially in the bible belt, were put off that it couldn't be used as a blunt instrument to convert people. Thus, this course may have been overlooked or found simply to be not acceptable because you couldn't prosthytize with it.In addition, in my area the Fellowship of Christian Athletes is widely available in many schools.
To: SmoothTalker
They're not talking about teaching the Bible as scripture, they're talking about teaching the Bible as literature. I went through this fight when I was in highschool eons ago, all the same stupid arguements, all the uproar. Bottom line is, you can't take upper level lit classes in college and not get a dose of the Bible along with it. It will better prepare students for those upper level classes and will certainly help make alot of literature to make sense.
16
posted on
01/26/2006 11:51:21 AM PST
by
swmobuffalo
(the only good terrorist is a dead one)
To: SmoothTalker
To be honest i'm not so sure if I want the public schools teaching the bible. I'd imagine by the time the teachers unions and administrators were done with their curriculum, the messages the students would be getting about the bible would be pretty off-base. I don't want government schools teaching my kid religion. I can do that myself.And thus the social conservative paradox. Torqued that it's not in the schools, but doesn't want secular teachers in a secular setting teaching it, and worse it might not be the flavor you would want it taught under.
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Grand Voyageur
19
posted on
01/29/2006 3:48:07 PM PST
by
mlc9852
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson