Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finalapproach29er; Paleo Conservative
I'm surprised that plane can get off the ground.

That's exactly what I thought.

It pays for the short field performance with extra structural weight in the wing and shorter range.

But is the extra MTOW, max takeoff weight worth it?

74 posted on 01/26/2006 9:51:04 AM PST by phantomworker (Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool...and don't accuse me of your imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: phantomworker
But is the extra MTOW, max takeoff weight worth it?

Probably not for most civilian uses. As I recall this is a proposal for a military cargo plane in a class that is smaller than a C-130. The ability to operate from short primitive airstrips near combat zones is more important than the ton mile costs or range. The fact that it is smaller than a C-17 means a C-17 doesn't have to be used to send a small payload when the speed of a jet is needed.

77 posted on 01/26/2006 10:04:25 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson