To: connectthedots
That is what I don't get. Why such rabid pushback on ID, which simply challanges unguided evolution (a theory) on a statistical basis.
To: Dead Dog
Why such rabid pushback on ID, which simply challanges unguided evolution (a theory) on a statistical basis.
Because people are pushing this conjecture based upon a "statistical" challenge founded in faulty premises as a scientific theory when it is not.
188 posted on
01/26/2006 1:10:38 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dead Dog
That is what I don't get. Why such rabid pushback on ID, which simply challanges unguided evolution (a theory) on a statistical basis. Nonsense. Any idea which challenges evolution, statistical or not, is not evidence for ID - it's just another red herring to obscure the lack of thought within ID itself.
204 posted on
01/26/2006 2:39:42 PM PST by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson