Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball
Finally, although Buckingham, Bonsell, and other defense witnesses denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what transpired at the June 2004 Board meetings, the record reflects that these witnesses either testified inconsistently, or lied outright under oath on several occasions, and are accordingly not credible on these points.
P. 105, Dover judgement

Defendants' previously referenced flagrant and insulting falsehoods to the Court provide sufficient and compelling evidence for us to deduce that any allegedly secular purposes that have been offered in support of the ID Policy are equally insincere.
p 132

[emphasis added]

101 posted on 01/26/2006 9:03:47 AM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: longshadow

Thanks for the details.

It's fairly obvious that he hasn't actually read the transcripts, in which the board members admit that they "testified inconsistently."

I suspect that he's still lurking, and just maybe he'll learn something.


115 posted on 01/26/2006 9:41:26 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson