Finally, although Buckingham, Bonsell, and other defense witnesses denied the reports in the news media and contradicted the great weight of the evidence about what transpired at the June 2004 Board meetings, the record reflects that these witnesses either testified inconsistently, or lied outright under oath on several occasions, and are accordingly not credible on these points.P. 105, Dover judgement
Defendants' previously referenced flagrant and insulting falsehoods to the Court provide sufficient and compelling evidence for us to deduce that any allegedly secular purposes that have been offered in support of the ID Policy are equally insincere.p 132
[emphasis added]
Thanks for the details.
It's fairly obvious that he hasn't actually read the transcripts, in which the board members admit that they "testified inconsistently."
I suspect that he's still lurking, and just maybe he'll learn something.