The problem is that ID'ers refuse to admit the fact that ID IS religion.
Promote your views, but do so without lying about it.
ID, according to the father of the movement, is religion attempting to control science.
I think it would be fair to say that most IDers are also creationists; but not all. It would be just as fair to say that many evolutionists are also secular humanists, but not all; and secular humanism is a religion.
I, for one, have been open with the fact that I believe in both creation and ID. They are not incompatible.
Those who support ID/creation are not attempting to control science any more than evolutionists; and probably less so than evolutionists.
The fact is, there are lots of unresolved issues related to the truth of evolution; so many that no reasonable person would claim that the evidene reaches the level of proof.