Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/25/2006 6:50:35 PM PST by UCAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: UCAL

He should step away from the bong.


44 posted on 01/25/2006 8:56:02 PM PST by FrogMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

Rothenberg fails to consider a few likely issues:

1. Dims are bigger crooks than Pubbies and you know the
Pubbies are digging furiously. Look for Dim scandals to begin surfacing before March 1 and continue thru the elections.

2. Dims are inherently stupid and will make at least one huge miscue btwn now and the elections.

3. Voters don't have long memories, the Dims have probably peaked much too early on this entire culture of corruption garbage.


46 posted on 01/25/2006 9:54:38 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

Hope springs eternal......*chuckle*


47 posted on 01/25/2006 10:05:58 PM PST by Al Simmons ("Only those are fit to live who do not fear to die" - Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL
- Stu Rothenberg

his sister is a Marxist college professor
49 posted on 01/25/2006 10:19:40 PM PST by Coleus (IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL
I dunno. The media have been sure flogging "Guns and Crime" with hit pieces plugging one of the Dimocraps favorite issues--Gun Control Legislation. They are ramping up the emotionalism for another run. They may be down, but they are using the full-court press, and it is early in the game.

Expect biased reporting which makes today's look fair and balanced by mid August.

They are getting shrill and desperate, especially with the trouncing the Leftists took up north. Maybe they figure they can't run away to Canada any more.

51 posted on 01/25/2006 10:27:58 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

Heck, we might as well let them have it. What difference would it make, really? Are they going to spend more than the Pubs? Are they going to try to pick a fight with the White House from the lower house, we've seen first hand how poorly that works. As long as we have Senate for the sake of judicial nominations we'll be just fine. IMO losing the house would probably make it much easier for us to gear up for 2008. All that said, we're not losing anything this year. We're in at least as good of a position as we were this time two years ago.


53 posted on 01/26/2006 12:16:36 AM PST by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

Stu is huffing paint fumes BUMP!


55 posted on 01/26/2006 5:02:14 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

DRUGS
I will post the last of my series on: "Why the Democrats have no chance in 2006" soon. I defy stuie to answer any of my points.


56 posted on 01/26/2006 5:10:09 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL
The problem is the Democrats have NO IDEAS. The Republicans do and ideas win every time. DUH

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

57 posted on 01/26/2006 5:15:58 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UCAL

Disclaimer: I am a personal friend of Stu. He and I talk by phone every few months, and I've had dinner at his home in the DC area. He had a show on the old NET (National Empowerment Television) that Paul Weyrich ran back during the 90's. You could get it on C-Band satellite. That's how I got to know him.

Stu is an independent analyst and has never worked for any candidates or parties (D or R) as far as I know.

His analysis, while certainly subject to error (he predicted that Dean would be the Democratic nominee), is pretty analytical, if such a thing is possible for anyone who lives in works in DC.

Just my $.02


61 posted on 01/26/2006 9:01:53 AM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson