He should step away from the bong.
Rothenberg fails to consider a few likely issues:
1. Dims are bigger crooks than Pubbies and you know the
Pubbies are digging furiously. Look for Dim scandals to begin surfacing before March 1 and continue thru the elections.
2. Dims are inherently stupid and will make at least one huge miscue btwn now and the elections.
3. Voters don't have long memories, the Dims have probably peaked much too early on this entire culture of corruption garbage.
Hope springs eternal......*chuckle*
Expect biased reporting which makes today's look fair and balanced by mid August.
They are getting shrill and desperate, especially with the trouncing the Leftists took up north. Maybe they figure they can't run away to Canada any more.
Heck, we might as well let them have it. What difference would it make, really? Are they going to spend more than the Pubs? Are they going to try to pick a fight with the White House from the lower house, we've seen first hand how poorly that works. As long as we have Senate for the sake of judicial nominations we'll be just fine. IMO losing the house would probably make it much easier for us to gear up for 2008. All that said, we're not losing anything this year. We're in at least as good of a position as we were this time two years ago.
Stu is huffing paint fumes BUMP!
DRUGS
I will post the last of my series on: "Why the Democrats have no chance in 2006" soon. I defy stuie to answer any of my points.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Disclaimer: I am a personal friend of Stu. He and I talk by phone every few months, and I've had dinner at his home in the DC area. He had a show on the old NET (National Empowerment Television) that Paul Weyrich ran back during the 90's. You could get it on C-Band satellite. That's how I got to know him.
Stu is an independent analyst and has never worked for any candidates or parties (D or R) as far as I know.
His analysis, while certainly subject to error (he predicted that Dean would be the Democratic nominee), is pretty analytical, if such a thing is possible for anyone who lives in works in DC.
Just my $.02