Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: We Have NO Reason to Fear Mrs. Clinton
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 1/25/06 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/25/2006 5:45:47 PM PST by wagglebee

RUSH: Bob in Corpus Christi, Texas, welcome to the program, sir. Nice to have you with us.

CALLER: Yes. Hi, Rush. About Hillary.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: You're wrong if you don't think she can win. Be afraid, be very afraid.

RUSH: (sighing)

CALLER: It's very simple. John Kerry almost won. He lost by three points, and he based his whole campaign on three and a half months in a swift boat. And his background, his voting record was buried. He made his name in VVAW, a bunch of bogus psychopathic radicals. He told a bunch of twisted lies about being in Cambodia. He goes to Paris and meets with the enemy during Vietnam and works on their behalf. All that was buried and he almost won. If it hadn't been for the alternative press, he would have won. (eStack: John F. Kerry Stack Catalogs the Near-Disaster)

RUSH: Yeah, the alternative --

CALLER: The same thing could happen with Hillary. They're going to bury all her past; they're going to portray her as a moderate like they did Kerry.

RUSH: One of the things you have to understand, though, about Kerry. I think it's a little bit mistaken to compare Kerry to Clinton because in truth, Kerry was an unknown to most of the people in the country. He was this dog-faced senator who didn't do much throughout his career, then when he runs for president he had a little bit of --

CALLER: Rush, consider this.

RUSH: Well, wait a minute.

CALLER: Think about -- think about -- he sounded like --

RUSH: No, the point is everyone knows who Mrs. Clinton is. That's my point. John Kerry would love the kind of fawning press that Mrs. Clinton has received for 13 years, and it's resulted in 51% of the people saying they definitely don't want to vote for her. Now, look it, you can sit there -- and I'm not going to disagree with you. She could win. I mean, anything can happen. Who knows the future? I'm just saying telling you there's no reason to be afraid of it.

CALLER: Rush. Rush, hold on. Consider Kerry's appearance. He looks like Frankenstein, he's got a boring, patrician voice that puts everybody to sleep. They can't stand it.

RUSH: Bob, hang on. Grab cut 13, Mike. You want to start comparing voices? Here's John Kerry, puts himself to sleep, puts everybody to sleep, contrasted with this.

HILLARY: I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, "We are Americans, and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!"

RUSH: Now, really? I mean, that's my point, you're going from one extreme to the other. Why do you want to be afraid? Seriously, Bob, why do you want to be afraid of her?

CALLER: Because she is something to be afraid of, and fear helps to motivate people. If it wasn't for people like you and me, we gotta get out there and stop people like Hillary.

RUSH: Well, I understand --

CALLER: We were able to stop Kerry and we've got to keep going because they're going to keep putting up people like Hillary and Kerry.

RUSH: Yeah, and where's it gotten them? The point is, look it. If you want to talk about fear, I'll allow it in this context. I would be afraid of a Hillary presidency. I mean, who wants that? But in terms of running a campaign and dealing with the potential candidacy that she might get nominated, the attitude to have is oppose her. Now, if part of the campaign is to warn people what will happen, issue by issue by issue, if she is elected, yeah, if you want to call that fear, I think that's just informing people. There's a big difference between trying to gin up a bunch of fear and paranoia than informing people on the truth and giving them facts and so forth. I guess when I say that I don't have any fear, I'm really speaking about her inevitability. I am not one of these people who think, and I haven't ever been, that she has an inevitability to be elected president or that she has an entitlement to it.

I don't think it's written in clouds, etched in stone, etched in the beach, wherever it gets written that that's something this country must have and that she must achieve, and a lot of people do, and I think when you end up being motivated by fear, sometimes it could be a good motivator. But a lot of times it makes you behave irrationally and assume things that aren't, and one of the bad things about fear is it goes hand in hand with assumption, and assuming things you don't know is a dangerous thing, and fear is going to make you assume negative things, and that's not productive, either. So I'm just trying to point out to you here that, despite all of this spin campaign that has been ginned up on her behalf for the last 13 years, it hasn't worked, for a whole host of reasons, but the main reason is her. There's just not that much likable about her, and there really hasn't been.

The sense of entitlement that the media, the Democrats have attached to her, is as I said in the last hour. Here she was this Chicago woman that went to school at Yale and met this horn dog from Arkansas, and she could have had a brilliant career on her own. You know, she was the leading feminist light. She made it plain as day she was a feminist, in every possible way. You could tell by looking. And she was going to go to all kinds of great heights. And then, and then she met and fell in love with a horn dog and gave it all up, gave it all up to move to the swamps of Arkansas, and had to lower herself to work in some place called the Rose Law Firm, so beneath her talents, so beneath her potential. Look at the years she sacrificed, and look at what she put the up with, Gennifer Flowers and who knows who else. And she stood behind him, and she was the reason he became elected president, and now it's her turn to be rewarded. That's been the whole thing that's propelled her. That's it. Her health care plan had a large role in the Republicans winning the House in 1994 in those elections. We're not dealing with somebody here who is unbeatable or who is even that formidable.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; dhpl; dittoheads; hillary2008; hillaryclinton; hillarypolls; impeached42; rushlimbaugh; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 last
To: wagglebee

Glad you posted this. I was in and out of the car and missed it.


161 posted on 01/26/2006 10:48:58 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
Red State America might be willing to overlook one divorce (Ronaldus Magnus comes to mind), but Rudy's situation is a whole different ballgame.

Agreed, 100%, speaking as a transplanted (to Canada) Red State Rep (Colorado) who has been through hell and back, but still is committed to making my marriage work.

Politics is tough, but just try having your whole country torn away from you, and then have to live with Canadians b*tching about the U.S. day in and day out.

Suffice it to say, there are challenges in any marriage, and you have GOT to try to make it work, no matter how bleak it seems.

And yes, one divorce, okay, maybe... but two?

You're right, Inspectorette. :)

162 posted on 01/26/2006 6:04:07 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tioga
I agree, if Bush gets another pick that leaves the WOT as THE issue. Rudy would be a shoe in then. Whether true or not he would be considered strong against the terrorists. He might not have won against her for the Senate race, but for President post 9/11 he would win easily

I'm with you, tioga. The main fear many Rep primary voters have is that Condi and/or Guiliani in the executive office will be soft on social issues. So if GW has a chance to kind of clamp down on SCOTUS... well... then that releases the pressure.

163 posted on 01/26/2006 6:07:19 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I agree with that.

Many thanks, pissant. And you know, your screen name isn't worthy of you. :)

I'm sorry I couldnt respond before. I just got a job with a local newspaper and was running around for the past two days talking to people about how, oh, how shall I put this:

there are adolescents in mortal danger (I sat there for a half an hour and saw it), because of so many factors. Basically, our small town is growing exponentially; the developers have the power, but there are industrial truck "bearing down" non stop on kids that have no choice but to walk on this street with no sidewalk.

Speaking of sidewalk, I guess I got sidetracked. :) Sorry... Take care, pissant. :)

164 posted on 01/26/2006 6:13:53 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; doug from upland; Peach; nutmeg; Mo1; onyx

time for a BUMP


165 posted on 09/05/2006 9:56:25 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance


Time to call it a night BUMP!


166 posted on 09/05/2006 10:01:54 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: TChad
My guess is that it will be George Allen vs. Mark Warner.

Much easier to mobilize against Hillary. Warner has the political savvy of a Bill Clinton and is capable of cutting into the left edges of the GOP ranks. How big of a chunk he can break off, remains to be seen.

167 posted on 09/06/2006 4:42:36 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
Hillary never ran a government agency or major corporation or any large organization.

Well no, but she was "co-president". She's the brainchild behind socialized health care.

168 posted on 09/06/2006 4:48:30 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson