Posted on 01/25/2006 3:51:57 PM PST by SandRat
WASHINGTON, Jan. 24, 2006 – President Bush yesterday called his terrorist surveillance plan a lawful, necessary step in the war against terrorism. Speaking at Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kan., Bush said he made the move to allow the National Security Agency to listen in on calls to terrorists as a means of protecting the American people.
Bush stressed that he acted to protect Americans. The authorization he gave was for the National Security Agency to intercept communications emanating between individuals inside the United States and outside the United States, when one of the numbers is "reasonably suspected to be an al Qaeda link or affiliate."
Bush said this does not constitute domestic spying. He said he was concerned about civil liberties and asked lawyers to review the decision. He also briefed members of Congress, he said.
Bush told the Kansans that Federal courts have consistently ruled that a president has Constitutional authority to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance. "Predecessors of mine have used that same constitutional authority," he said.
Another top official put the issue into perspective. "Had this program been in effect prior to 9/11, it is my professional judgment that we would have detected some of the 9/11 al Qaeda operatives in the United States, and we would have identified them as such," Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden, principal deputy director of national intelligence, said at the National Press Club yesterday.
Hayden, formerly head of the NSA, stressed that the authorization had taken account of individual rights. "That authorization was based on an intelligence community assessment of a serious and continuing threat to the homeland," he said. "The lawfulness of the actual authorization was reviewed by lawyers at the Department of Justice and the White House and was approved by the attorney general."
Bush said a recent Supreme Court case also allows this type of surveillance as part of the Congressional authorization to use force against al Qaeda. "The Supreme Court ruled it gave the president additional authority to use what it called the fundamental incidents of waging war against al Qaeda," he said. "It means Congress gave me the authority to use necessary force to protect the American people, but it didn't prescribe the tactics. It said: 'Mr. President, you got the power to protect us, but we're not going to tell you how.'"
One of the ways to protect the American people is to understand the enemy's intentions, Bush said. "I told you it's a different kind of war with a different kind of enemy," he said. "If they're making phone calls into the United States, we need to know why, to protect you."
Hayden said no communications are more important to the safety of the United States than those affiliated with al Qaeda and "with one end in the United States."
"The president's authorization allows us to track this kind of call more comprehensively and more efficiently," he said.
PING for President Bush's remarks.
Bet yer sweet bippy it is!
Spot on.
President Bush said that as long as he holds office, he will do everything possible to prevent another 9-11.
I am behind him 100 percent!!!
At least they did not headline it as the MSM buzzword 'Domestic Spying'.
BTTT
I heard a radio interview with Oliver North this morning. He was defending the wire-tapping, saying he owes his life to it.
Remember when assassins were targeting Oliver North and his family? The plot was discovered and his whole family saved because of the Governments use of secret wire-tapping approved by Ronald Reagan. The same type of wire-tapping that Bush is being run through the ringer for now. North also said he could say very little about how the plot was uncovered, what methods were used, and who was in the know, for National Security reasons - the same reasons the Whitehouse can't disclose what's going on behind the scenes, even though by doing so would defends Bush's right to do what he is doing.
How can we get Fox News reporters to STOP calling this a "Domestic Wire-Tapping Program". Greg Kelly (greg.kelley@foxnews.com) just used that term and has been for some time. I thought Greg would be great replacement for James Rosen, but now I'm having second thoughts. Please write Fox, especially Brit Hume, their chief in Washington, and get him on the case.
Terrorist Surveillance.
That tells the story so much better than the liberal/MSM designation as: "Eavesdropping on Americans."
When a terrorist calls America on the phone, should the U.S. intercept that call?
When a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer in America calls an overseas number, should the U.S. intercept that call?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.