Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Velveeta
Evidently a BOMB THREAT doesn't meet HER definition of probable cause.

It's a judge's call to define probable cause, not a librarian's - that's why law enforcement officials are required to secure a warrant before conducting searches.

33 posted on 01/25/2006 12:38:11 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

actually, if I agree that law enforcement can search my home, then they can search my home. I don't need a judge to tell me whether or not it is reasonable. I have that option, of course. But a library is a public institution. No one should expect that anything they do in a library would remain private. I never have. Whether the feds have a right to go into a local library and order folks around is another matter. Local cops should have been able to do it. But that's just my opinion.


38 posted on 01/25/2006 12:43:03 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

"It's a judge's call to define probable cause, not a librarian's - that's why law enforcement officials are required to secure a warrant before conducting searches."

Couldn't this fall under the category of a hot pursuit? It reads like a terror threat was recieved, immediately traced to a specific location, and when the cops arrived, a bureaucrat says not so fast.

If someone is shot on the street in front of the library, and the perp is seen to run inside, do the police need a warrant to pursue?


50 posted on 01/25/2006 1:00:50 PM PST by Jim Verdolini (We had it all, but the RINOs stalked the land and everything they touched was as dung and ashes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson