Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: randomnumber

It's cut and dried that the FBI needed a warrant to perform a search without consent, and they went and got one. I think what is irritating to most people on this thread (me, anyway) is that the library did not consent to the search.


26 posted on 01/25/2006 12:29:46 PM PST by Caveman Lawyer (Cluckin' defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Caveman Lawyer
I think what is irritating to most people on this thread (me, anyway) is that the library did not consent to the search.

The Mayor and Librarian acted like an outraged homeowners instead of cooperative public officials.

30 posted on 01/25/2006 12:35:08 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Caveman Lawyer
"...I think what is irritating to most people on this thread (me, anyway) is that the library did not consent to the search."

Ah! Because a person chose to exercise their rights under the the Constitution it makes it bad.

Got it, but I'm not in agreement.

If it were me, I might have agreed to the search given the circumstances if it were explained reasonably, but since I wasn't, I'll go with door number 1.

32 posted on 01/25/2006 12:37:37 PM PST by randomnumber (I have no excuse for my behavior; do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson