Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Littlejon

Just more business for the other banks in the region(s) affected.


7 posted on 01/25/2006 9:00:45 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative; Littlejon
Just more business for the other banks in the region(s) affected.

On the other hand, Congress could pass legislation prohibiting all banks from making such loans. They could also prohibit selling municipal tax-free bonds for those purposes. I think if Republicans introduced such legislation, DemocRATS would have little choice but to go along with it.

19 posted on 01/25/2006 9:09:56 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

Not necessarily. If I lived and banked in that area, this announcement would prompt me to demand whatever institution I currently banked at to announce the same policy, or lose my business. Lose all the business of people who feel strongly about eminent domain abuse, and you'll have to get an awful lot of developer business to make up for it. And it's virtually impossible for banks or S&Ls to be competitive in the loan market if they don't hae a strong deposit base.


29 posted on 01/25/2006 9:26:57 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

I have your glass of bitters here, sir, it's half empty.


36 posted on 01/25/2006 9:42:17 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson