In combat situations you become very close to your squadmates. This bond is more than just akin to love, it is love. You will die for your squadmate, and know that he will die for you, or you both will go down together, proudly.
This is a problem with women in combat, confusing this love for sexuality. It is also man's natural desire to protect the weaker ones in the tribe. This is also the problem with homosexuals in combat. Combat requires ferocity, something most homosexuals don't possess. Put this all together with the degradation of the squad's moral and its clear that homosexuals are counterproductive to victory.
Combat requires ferocity, something most homosexuals don't possess.
Gosh, how does anybody know how much ferocity a homosexual has or doesn't have. What about a wimpy heterosexual soldier? He could be just as much of a liabilty to his unity as a gay soldier. What if there was a kick-a$$ gay soldier, brave as hell, could do no wrong...are you saying you'd rather have the wimpy hetero fighting by your side instead of him?