[brwnsuga]

But there is no possible way women can be "equal" in the military, unless they are filling administrative jobs.

A woman's bullet will stop the enemy just like a man's bullet, right?

[William Terrell]

A woman's bullet will stop the enemy just like a man's bullet, right?

That would be OK if a combat soldier's only job is to fling bullets. But it turns out to be 1/100% of the soldier's tour of duty.

Women degrade the performance of a combat unit. It's not a slug at women; it's just a fact, and it is and has always been a socialist/communist mandate.

Consider, if two units equaly supplied, armed and knowledgeable, one entirely female and one entirely male, which unit would you figure would win?

The male unit, of course. This means, ipso facto, that each woman introduced into the mix with duties that include interaction with the enemy will make the unit less effective than it was before.

Why would want to do that?