One EMP over Kansas or so, and it's over. What's our response? Nuke the entire Middle East?
My guess: We'd be too busy gathering roots and boiling them for dinner.
If the U.S. government is aware ahead of this i bet there is a defense or contingency plan for this.. and i hope America can retaliate..
To: ChristianDefender
If you were looking for an uplifting column this week, I recommend you stop right here and click into some nicer columns by my esteemed WND colleagues. lol....does this guy not understand that people who read WND are specifically looking for doom and gloom articles?
2 posted on
01/24/2006 4:55:12 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: ChristianDefender
3 posted on
01/24/2006 4:55:12 PM PST by
Dallas59
((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
To: ChristianDefender
I don't think that a nuclear explosion 300 miles above the surface would, in fact, do any such thing.
To: ChristianDefender
it was mentioned as one of our options being considered to use in Iraq
5 posted on
01/24/2006 4:57:46 PM PST by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: ChristianDefender
Anybody who goes to WorldNetDaily should have their BS alert meter set on high.
6 posted on
01/24/2006 4:58:10 PM PST by
WestVirginiaRebel
(The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
To: ChristianDefender
7 posted on
01/24/2006 4:58:37 PM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: ChristianDefender
P.S. Forget about boiling roots. Rats are tastier and have more protein.
8 posted on
01/24/2006 4:59:10 PM PST by
WestVirginiaRebel
(The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
To: ChristianDefender
Gathering roots? With my shotgun and three rifles? How's that work?
11 posted on
01/24/2006 5:14:18 PM PST by
gotribe
(Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
To: ChristianDefender
13 posted on
01/24/2006 5:26:28 PM PST by
Riley
("What color is the boathouse at Hereford?")
To: ChristianDefender
EMP over the US? How about the threat of one over Europe?
The Euros would go into appeasement mode faster than you could blink.
15 posted on
01/24/2006 5:41:08 PM PST by
glorgau
To: ChristianDefender
"If the U.S. government is aware ahead of this i bet there is a defense or contingency plan for this.. and i hope America can retaliate.." Yup--it's called "nuclear missile launching submarines". Immune to any kind of EMP attack.
To: ChristianDefender
This article is such bullsh*t I don't even know where to begin. Nothing but Joseph Farah's crap rehashed again.
17 posted on
01/24/2006 5:42:37 PM PST by
COEXERJ145
(Despite Popular Opinion, Tom Tancredo Does Not Support Deporting Illegal Aliens.)
To: ChristianDefender
The source of the rocket would likely be easily determined and retaliation (using equivalent weapons) swift. It wouldn't damage the entire country but could still cause considerable damage in the commercial world.
To: ChristianDefender
We would detonate an EMP approximately 6 feet above street level in Tehran. That ought to do in the 2 or 3 radios and a couple of TVs they have.
22 posted on
01/24/2006 6:07:28 PM PST by
Sender
(As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. -Sun Tzu)
To: ChristianDefender
Nuke 'em anyway, who cares if they really did it. It would serve as an example to the world that you don't want to be the one twisting our tail when someone gets hurt.
29 posted on
01/24/2006 6:29:12 PM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: ChristianDefender
I have some doubts here.
First, building a Nuclear Device that will merely explode and kill people is hard enough to do. Fat Man and Little Boy were primitive weapons compared to today, but there are very few countries in the Nuclear Club right now. Very few countries that even have the technology to build a low-yield weapon like those dropped on Japan during WWII. It is more than likely, if left alone, that Iran will do this, though. Not a good chance that Iran will be left alone, though.
Secondly, refining a device to do exactly what you subscribe is a major leap in technology. Iran will not have this capability for the forseeable future, if ever. Also, getting a bomb to detonate in the atmosphere is a little more complicated than using an impact trigger for sure. (Gravity Bombs)
Thirdly, they would have to smuggle it in. With our porous borders it wouldn't be impossible, but it wouldn't be as easy as delivering it on a Minuteman.
I don't mean to poo-poo your scenario here. I may not even know what I am taliking about and I'm no expert, but it just doesn't make sense to me.
32 posted on
01/24/2006 6:39:18 PM PST by
lmr
(You can have my Tactical Nuclear Weapons when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.)
To: ChristianDefender
Sorry, not your scenario... My bad, I should have realized this was someone like WND or Debka.
33 posted on
01/24/2006 6:42:48 PM PST by
lmr
(You can have my Tactical Nuclear Weapons when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.)
To: ChristianDefender
Electro-Magnetic Pulse This is seriesly overblown. It's like worrying about fallout instead of the thermonuclear detonation itself.
34 posted on
01/24/2006 6:45:19 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: ChristianDefender
EMP is not a new threat. Scientists and engineers have known about this since the nuclear age began at White Sands. The signifigance of this article is the fact that "consumer electronics" would be heavily damaged, however, critical military and government equipment are well shielded.
44 posted on
01/24/2006 7:39:42 PM PST by
InShanghai
(I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson