Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward
You are getting mixed up between the act and the regulation.

You can read Tanc's bill, can you imagine the difficuty the bureacracy would interpreting what he is saying much less writing a reg around it. Impossible.

Face reality, Tanc had years to write a bill but he never would. In fact, the only reason he wrote this was Kyl and Cornyn were sitting down on his position and he to squirm away a the last minute and try to be something different.

The most ludicrous part of his bill is the Theory of Attrition. I'm sure that would withstand a court challenge. Not.

71 posted on 01/25/2006 2:49:12 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin

Here's a link to his bill.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.03333:
perhaps you can direct me to the portion that covers this "Theory of Attrition". Or is that part going to be in the regulation? LOL!


72 posted on 01/25/2006 2:55:46 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson