Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maligning Fathers (PBS whitewashes anti-dad bias)
Reason ^ | January 24, 2006 | Cathy Young

Posted on 01/24/2006 10:06:22 AM PST by neverdem

PBS whitewashes anti-dad bias

Last November, I wrote about the controversy about the Public Broadcasting Service documentary, Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories, which claimed that male batterers and child abusers frequently gain custody of their children in divorce cases after the mothers' claims of abuse are disbelieved by the courts. The film caused an outcry from fathers' rights groups. In response to these protests, PBS announced a 30-day review to determine whether the film met the editorial guidelines for fairness and accuracy.

Unfortunately, it seems that the review amounted to little more than a whitewash.

On December 21, PBS issued a statement acknowledging that the film "would have benefited from more in-depth treatment of the complex issues," but also concluded that "the producers approached the topic with the open-mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists" and that the program's claims were supported by "extensive" research.

Those claims included some highly inflammatory assertions: for instance, that three-quarters of contested custody cases involve a history of domestic violence, and that wife and child abusers who seek child custody after divorce win two-thirds of the time.

Connecticut Public Television, which co-produced Breaking the Silence, has supplied me with two detailed reports—one from producer Dominique Lasseur, the other from Lasseur and George Washington University law professor Joan Meier, the film's lead expert—on which PBS drew to support its conclusion. To call these reports shoddy and self-serving would be an understatement.

Thus, the reports cite the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's Gender Bias Study of 1989 as proof that fathers who seek custody receive it at least 70 percent of the time—even though this study does not distinguish custody disputes from cases in which the father got custody by mutual agreement. Other sources used to support the claim of male advantage are even weaker: They include the Battered Mothers' Testimony Project from the Wellesley Center for Women, which used a sample of 40 women with grievances about the family courts. No mention is made of much larger, representative studies of divorcing couples (such as the one reported by Stanford University psychologist Eleanor Maccoby and Harvard law professor Robert Mnookin in the 1992 book Dividing the Child) showing that far fewer fathers than mothers get the custodial arrangements they want.

Assertions that abusive men are especially likely to seek custody of children and are likely to prevail in court are backed by similarly slipshod evidence.

Defending the claim made in Breaking the Silence that children are in greater danger of abuse from fathers than from mothers, Lasseur and Meier point to several limited studies that often lump together biological fathers with stepfathers and mothers' boyfriends (who, statistically, pose a far higher risk). Yet even these cherry-picked statistics show that a significant proportion of perpetrators of severe child abuse are mothers—which makes the film's exclusive focus on abusive fathers difficult to defend.

The producer's account of how he went about researching the film reinforces the impression of bias. Battered women's advocates are presumed to be disinterested champions of victims, even though many of them have an ideological agenda of equating family violence with male oppression of women and children; advocates for divorced fathers or abused men are seen as tainted with "antiwoman bias." In the same vein, Lasseur's report is supplemented by a letter signed by "98 professionals" who support the film's conclusions—but a number of those "professionals" are feminist activists, including National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy.

Lasseur and Meier profess to be shocked that anyone could see the film as collectively maligning divorced fathers when it focuses only on abusive fathers in contested custody cases. Yet the film clearly suggests that if a divorcing father decides to fight for custody, chances are he's a batterer who's using the custody suit as an abuse tactic—and that if he's accused of abuse, he's most probably guilty. And that's not prejudicial?

Notably, PBS ombudsman Michael Getler and especially Corporation for Public Broadcasting ombudsman Ken Bode have taken a far more negative view of the film than did the PBS review. On January 4, Bode wrote, "After close review including discussions and e-mail exchanges with those involved with the program or closely affected by it, I found the program to be so totally unbalanced as to fall outside the boundaries of PBS editorial standards on fairness and balance."

The one silver lining in this mess is that PBS has decided to commission another, more in-depth film on the subject of abuse and child custody. Let's hope that this time, it tackles the subject with real "open-mindedness and commitment to fairness."


Cathy Young is a Reason contributing editor. This column originally appeared in the Boston Globe


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bias; breakingthesilence; documentary; domesticviolence; fathers; liberalmedia; pbs; whitewash

1 posted on 01/24/2006 10:06:24 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
PBS announced a 30-day review to determine whether the film met the editorial guidelines for fairness and accuracy.

Maybe y'all should make these determinations BEFORE you broadcast them?

2 posted on 01/24/2006 10:12:55 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
From what I've read,accusations of spousal abuse and child abuse/molestation are SOP today in divorce cases.IMO,there can be no doubt that some...and perhaps even most...of these accusations have merit,but I'll bet that some of them don't.

I'm amazed and saddened by the venom that is often displayed in divorce cases...often by both sides.

3 posted on 01/24/2006 10:12:55 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The FemiNazi dominated family courts make life a living hell for divorced dads across the US. This is one of many ways, there is over-whelming bias against men these days.


4 posted on 01/24/2006 10:29:12 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"...I found the program to be so totally unbalanced as to fall outside the boundaries of PBS editorial standards on fairness and balance."

But, hey, it bashes men, and we're PBS, so...

5 posted on 01/24/2006 10:32:27 AM PST by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The should have interviewed me

I had 24 witnesses against my ex-wife - she had NONE against me. I dont drink, smoke, go to bars, use drugs, etc...

I PROVED she was lying when she said I assaulted her, becuase I had witnesses to her doing it to herself AND was able to prove I was not evenhome at the time (she was arrested for filing false charges)

The courts own doctor recommended that not only should I have sole custudy, but she should not even be allowed overnight visitation until she receive mental help. They began living with me for the duration of the trial. While living with me they showed documented proof of improvement.

One of my daughters was hospitalized for neglect while in her care for a weekend, DURING the trial.

Her sons were arrested for cocaine and a robbery with a gun during the trial.

This is only the tip oif the iceburg.

End result: Idiot NY State Supreme Court Judge John O'Donnell TOOK THEM AWAY from me to give back to the diagnosed psychopath mother.

When we appealed and pointed out that idiot judges decision was 6 pages of factual errors the appeals court UPHELD it.


6 posted on 01/24/2006 10:47:16 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

that three-quarters of contested custody cases involve a ACCUSATION of history of domestic violence, and that wife and child abusers who seek child custody after divorce win two-thirds of the time.

Accusations ain't proof of guilt. Especially when between two bitter and hurt people.

An VERY bias program. IMO


7 posted on 01/24/2006 11:02:50 AM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Wow what a story.


One question.



Why o why did you marry this woman?


8 posted on 01/24/2006 11:05:16 AM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

it was a setup
you think you find the angel of your dreams- until she lies about being on birth control and then the demons come out after she says she is pregnant.

I am not faultless- I was definately stupid- but the court was even stupider.


9 posted on 01/24/2006 11:07:22 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

No excuse for the court, to be sure. At least you can claim "bewitchment"


10 posted on 01/24/2006 3:59:28 PM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Want anti-dad bias? Watch the Disney channel.. The Proud Family is a cartoon where the mom is a successful veterinarian and the dad is a bumbling fool...On Even Stevens, the mom is a successful state senator and the dad is an unemployed attorney. Mom always knows what is right, dad is an idiot.

Ever notice that there is usually no dad around in Disney movies, or else he is a jerk?

Other programs are the same. The Berenstain Bears cartoon always shows mom as having all the answers, dad is a buffoon.

With the help of television, Feminazis have emasculated males in our culture.

I try to point out the obvious bias to my sons whenever possible.


11 posted on 01/24/2006 7:16:47 PM PST by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson