One again, another liberal whackjob who thinks 9/11 was a made for TV movie. It didn't really happen, so why are we off killing terrorists(oops, freedom fighters) in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Are these people honest-to-God serious? What would these people fight for? How about OBL coming up the Potomac river on gunboats? Would they lob some mortar shells at OBL from GW's backyard at Mount Vernon? Or would they try to reason with the man? Try a more compassionate way to fight terrorism? Honestly, I think they'd chose the latter.
Surely, there must be something these people would fight for? What then?
The right to kill unborn babies perhaps?
We already know.
Violent "resistance" at WTO meetings & Republican conventions; armed attacks on Republican campaign offices; ELF/ALF "actions"; destruction of GM seed test plots; relentless use of the judicial system to obtain 'legislation' they couldn't get legislatively enacted...the list goes on & on.
OTOH, very little of that is "for"; almost all of it is "against".
Their motto is, "Birkenstocks & tofu for all, paid for by none!"
"One again, another liberal whackjob who thinks 9/11 was a made for TV movie. It didn't really happen, so why are we off killing terrorists(oops, freedom fighters) in Iraq and Afghanistan?"
As George Carlin once said;
"If crime fighters fight crime, and firefighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight?"
The left is entirely correct labeling terrorists as freedom fighters.
I am working on a book involving a war between the United States and an alliance between China and Mexico and you should have heard the screams this brought when I presented some of my sample chapters.