Skip to comments.
DC March For Life Pics (Vanity)
January, 24, 2005
Posted on 01/24/2006 12:59:06 AM PST by right-wingin_It
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: jwalsh07
Overturning Roe leaves abortion regulation up to the states. I don't think one state will outlaw first trimester abortion outright.
In other words, the status quo for the great number of abortions won't change.
41
posted on
01/24/2006 7:38:02 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: right-wingin_It
The most obvious difference between this group and the proaborts is the lack of uglyangry types in your pics.
42
posted on
01/24/2006 7:38:39 AM PST
by
r9etb
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: MudPuppy
I know parents of good will disagree, but I believe children have a tremendous capacity to understand evil. There are children who have an aversion to blood and they should be told not to look at the graphic pictures, but in general, I've got no problem with children seeing the horror of abortion.
44
posted on
01/24/2006 7:41:35 AM PST
by
old and tired
(Run Swannie, run!)
To: old and tired
"custody of the eyes" is a good thing to teach at an early age.
I personally don't like the abortion pictures either....I usually avert my eyes and say a special prayer...
45
posted on
01/24/2006 7:45:41 AM PST
by
MudPuppy
(Another Day ~ Another Adventure!)
To: HitmanNY
Overturning Roe leaves abortion regulation up to the states.Probably.
I don't think one state will outlaw first trimester abortion outright.
Maybe, maybe not.
In other words, the status quo for the great number of abortions won't change.
Absolutely wrong. Compare the number of abortions per year pre Roe and post Roe if you want some idea how Roe affected the numbers. Then ask yourself if 140,000 plus second trimester abortions per year is a great number of dead babies. The status quo will change alright, and it will change significantly.
46
posted on
01/24/2006 7:50:05 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: HitmanNY
well let me say this, my husband, who is a well respected attorney here in DC, was at the prolife march yesterday with our two teenagers, as he has been for the past half dozen years or so. and i ASSURE you he knows, probably better than you do, the ramifications of overturning Roe v. Wade.
47
posted on
01/24/2006 7:52:03 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: jwalsh07
You need to go back thirty years for that last part. It's 2006, not 1973. A whole generation plus of women grew up with abortion on demand, the majority of those abortions have been first trimester abortions.
Tf you think overturning Roe will turn back the culture thirty years, then it's you who are absolutely wrong.
The pro life movement has been stymied and defeated consistently for over thirty years. They continue to argue that abortion should be illegal (and many of us think it should), oblivious to the fact that the consensus opinion in the USA settled that a long time ago, and they lost.
Keep it up. They say the definition on insanity is to continue to do the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. By that standard, the pro life leadership should have been institutionalized a long time ago.
48
posted on
01/24/2006 7:54:37 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: right-wingin_It
Thank you for the pictures right-wingin_It.
49
posted on
01/24/2006 7:56:25 AM PST
by
fatima
To: xsmommy
I am a well respected attorney also, licensed in NY. Your assurance isn't as impressive as you thought.
Which state of the union does he think will outright outlaw first trimester abortions? Does that state have many abortions anyway? Frankly, I don't think any state will do it.
I could be wrong, but in any case that isn't a legal opinion, its an evaluation of the political climate.
Your assurance is appreciated, though misplaced.
50
posted on
01/24/2006 7:57:31 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: HitmanNY
The point of the March for Life is to combat the culture of death that is insidious in today's society. It is a mistake to treat prolife people as political/legal naifs.
51
posted on
01/24/2006 8:07:53 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: xsmommy
My comment did come across as flippant and I apologize. Approaching the abortion atrocity as a cultural matter is wise. Approaching it as a legal matter isn't wise, though.
That culture of death is insidiuos and pervasive. I agree with you 100%.
52
posted on
01/24/2006 8:13:41 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: HitmanNY
53
posted on
01/24/2006 8:22:02 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: Pyro7480
I stopped to watch the March go by, right near the EWTN tent, and it took the March over an hour to pass by! Awesome!
54
posted on
01/24/2006 8:22:25 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: MudPuppy
I told her she could avert her eyes if she say the pictures since they are so disturbing - but that they truly represent what happens. She didn't notice them as she was too busy with the crowd and our group flag. Great. I hope to be there next year.
55
posted on
01/24/2006 8:24:44 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: HitmanNY
A whole generation plus of women grew up with abortion on demand... They know that one-third of their peers are missing and that they escaped the butcher's knife, which is why they're generally more pro-life than their parents.
56
posted on
01/24/2006 8:28:05 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: jwalsh07; HitmanNY
I don't think one state will outlaw first trimester abortion outright. 10 bucks says my home state of MS would...in a heartbeat.
57
posted on
01/24/2006 8:34:09 AM PST
by
bourbon
To: bourbon
You got a bet: I bet that if Roe is overturned, MS would not outlaw first trimester abortions outright (that is, ban all abortions in the first trimester except for the usual exceptions).
58
posted on
01/24/2006 8:37:09 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: HitmanNY
Deal. I'll wager a tenner on that.
And honestly, I'd love to be in a position to lose this bet since it is conditioned on Roe being overturned!
59
posted on
01/24/2006 8:40:37 AM PST
by
bourbon
To: bourbon
Indeed! I am pro life, don't get me wrong, but as a practical matter I just don't see our culture right now (or anytime soon) supporting an outright ban on first trimester abortions.
Keep the faith!
60
posted on
01/24/2006 8:42:38 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson