[Dimensio]

You want some examples of evolutionists who are Marxists?

No, because I'm already aware of some "evolutionists" who are Marxists. I was asking why you singled out the subset of those who accept evolution who also happen to be Marxists, given that the majority of those who accept evolution are not Marxists. I was also asking for specific incidences of fraud.

[caffe]

I think you should check your post again: indeed you did ask for examples which I provided and there are many more US "scientists" who admit they are Marxists. If you wanted examples of fraud you perhaps should have framed your question more clearly. I note someone else is giving you examples but you don't acknowledge these frauds. Indeed, you are simply another zealot who marches towards a different beat.

[RunningWolf]

Subset?? What a subset.

These are big name people. I would say you would hold them out as some of your leaders, you have most likely quoted one or two of them. But I will let you respond directly to that, and say whether you reject or take on their philosophic views (as voiced by their writings)

Also caffe said //Excuse me, the evolutionists marxists are guilty of more fraud than Clinton//

Do you Dimensio deny that?

Clinton perjured himself about a sexual relation. Where has your head been, in the sand?

Do you deny all the fraud that has been perpetrated towards the advancement of evo? I count all fraud as the set including that fraud debunked by other scientists.

Wolf