To: Nateman
The difference between Carter and Clinton is that Carter was only incompetent, while Clinton was malicious.
5 posted on
01/23/2006 6:49:58 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
The difference between Carter and Clinton is that Carter was only incompetent Jimmy Carter is pure EVIL. Slickmeister wants to be Jimmy when he grows up.
14 posted on
01/23/2006 6:55:13 PM PST by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
To: Brilliant
I think Carter was personally malicious too. He was not as sexually immoral as Clinton but maybe even more mean spirited.
20 posted on
01/23/2006 6:59:50 PM PST by
yarddog
To: Brilliant
The difference between Carter and Clinton is that Carter was only incompetent, while Clinton was malicious.GOOD POINTS. :D
40 posted on
01/23/2006 7:19:10 PM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: Brilliant
Jimmy was plenty spiteful as well.
47 posted on
01/23/2006 7:30:55 PM PST by
1066AD
To: Brilliant
Pithy post of the year. It's yours.
To: Brilliant
Freepers are so on target! It constantly amazes me.
56 posted on
01/23/2006 7:49:35 PM PST by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops.)
To: Brilliant
I no longer think that Carter was only incompetent. His decisions as president added to his present-day speeches tell me he is something worse; a man who doesn't believe in his country and one who is willing to say so in time of war.
73 posted on
01/23/2006 9:37:47 PM PST by
skr
("That book [Bible], sir, is the rock on which our republic rests."--Andrew Jackson)
To: Brilliant
I think Carter was more malicious in that he convinced so many people that he wasn't.
77 posted on
01/23/2006 9:56:27 PM PST by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson