To: TheBrotherhood
You cited a quote that a scholar named Moore concluded
a visit occurred as the evidence that makes "Darwin recanted on his deathbed" a historical fact. You selectively and with absolutely jeering dishonesty omitted:
- ... that the visit having happened is but one man's opinion,
- ... that the overwhelming preponderance of opinion (and the opinion of the AiG article) is that Darwin did not recant,
- ... that the very same article notes a distinction between the claims of Lady Hope's story and Darwin actually recanting his theory.
You, Sir, are not only a liar but a painfully obvious liar. A particularly bad dancer of the Dummy Dance of Creationism. F- and dismissed.
751 posted on
01/27/2006 6:14:16 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: VadeRetro; TheBrotherhood
You declare him a liar on your three points. And 66% of those based on opinion, and the other 33% a distinction??
Sigh.. What shall I say about your grading, your judgment Retro? Well I shall say nothing because I choose not too.
TheBrotherhood is still there, despite your dismissal.
Regards,
Wolf
752 posted on
01/28/2006 12:03:59 AM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: VadeRetro
LOL!
Typical coward behavior. They got F this and F that before they run away with their tail between their legs.
You're dismissed too, pal.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson