[highball]

The truth is no one will know on this issue.

That is the most charitable reading one can give of Lady Hope's story, which is (as Answers in Genesis admits) contains "factual inaccuracies."

It's also not what TheBrotherhood posted. If he had said that "no one will know," that could have been defensible.

But TheBrotherhood said that Darwin's deathbed recantation was "historical fact." He repeated that phrase several times.

Which, even by the most charitable reading of Lady Hope's story, is a lie.

[RunningWolf]

Look forget about what AIG says. Or is that the one thing AIG says that you agree with, is that it?

Since no one knows for sure except Darwin and maybe Lady Hope, it is equally "historical fact" whether this happened or not, it all depends who's word you want to take.

Now what you consider to be defensible or charitable is irrelevant the historical factualness of Darwin's recantation, and addressing that would be a waste of my time anyway so I wont even get into that.

Wolf