[highball]

TheBrotherhood, this seems to be a core tenet of evo logic. They begin on the basis you are a liar. I say they lie in their accusations.

You could, but there would be no truth in it. TheBrotherhood has been trapped in his lies.

He asserted known falsehoods as "historical facts." When caught, he posted links from a creationist website proving that the "historical facts" were lies, but edited the quotes to make it appear as though they were supporting his contention.

Hint: when even Answers in Genesis tells you that you shouldn't use a particular argument against evolution because it's not true, you really ought not use that argument.

Any honest creationist would have to decry these transparent falsehoods. That no creationist has done so, and now one rises to his defense, tells us much about the honesty of the movement as a whole.

[TheBrotherhood]

>but edited the quotes to make it appear as though they were supporting his contention.

Could you please show us all the quote in question before and after the revision/modification? I've never edited a quote, that I can remember.

Thank you.

[RunningWolf]

You know Brotherhood, once you clear away all the clever quibbling and evasive circular logic, we get to the nub of the assault on you. Basically it is Lady Hope is a liar and therefore so are you.

But since Darwin never made public his faith re awakened nor his recantation of evo, no one will ever know for sure. This insistence that because his family was not aware of this may not be evidence of anything other than they were not aware of everything that Darwin took in his heart to the grave with him. The truth is no one will know on this issue.

Actually it is not as important to me as it seems to be to them whether this happened or not, likewise whether it some evo or creo website approves it. In any event AIG said 'it appears Darwin did not recant', this is not a factual assertion at at all as, once again the distorter's would insist otherwise.


You know Brotherhood, by their own logic and what constitutes evidence I will say

1. Evo never happened

or

2. There is a much greater case to be made that Darwin recanted to Lady Hope than there ever was for evo to have happened.

Now as far as any assaults on my honesty or integrity etc., This has come from the same group that says the Bible is all fairy tale and evo with all the dead ends, (and all the fraud occurred in its short history) is true.

Wolf