Replies

I did not make post 377 that you attribute to me. You should have post 426 retracted by the Moderator. That's an insult to me.

You are correct. I confused you with another poster - you did not claim that Darwin said blacks were more closely related to monkeys. That was warpcorebreach, and I am sorry for confusing the two of you. I apologize.

Kindly allow me to revise my post #426, only dealing with your own words, TheBrotherhood. Taking out the final inaccurate sentence, it should have read:

Wow. What an amazing collection of weaseling.
I've expressed my opinions and ideas and at times facts - or what I believed at the time to be facts - that I have read in this FR threads.

And when those "facts" were instantly debunked - by creationist sites no less - you didn't back down, you insisted that those lies were true.
If I state something as fact and the experts in these evolution threads believe that it is not, then please do correct me.

We have. You kept repeating the lies.
If there is a divergence of opinions as what constitutes a fact, then I tend to research the issue on my own, but may not conclusively say for sure whether what I have arrived at is indeed a fact or a supposition. All of which is a fancy way of trying to distance yourself from the lies you continued to spread even after they were shown to be false, without actually admitting that they were false.
Cute.

There. I have corrected my error.

Would you now correct yours, and admit that the lies you posted again and again about Darwin somehow "recanting" were just that?

Will you admit that the "facts" you repeatedly made up supporting your initial assertion were also lies?