[kimosabe31]

Thanks coyoteman for helping me out with the terms and definitions. I actually knew a few of those already but not nearly to the scholarly depth that you provided.

You conclude your post with the assertion that "evolution is a theory". However, if we examine your definition of theory:

(1)A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; and

(2)An organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena

We find that evolution satisfies neither of these. It is not a well substantiated explanation of the appearance of man on earth and it explains nothing in repeatable experimental experimental terms.

If it were the explanation, WHERE THEN ARE THE TRANSITIONAL FORMS?? Why are there no transitional life forms to point to? Did the forces of evolution exist only long enough to evolve man and then suddenly halt? Give me a break. The theory (?) of evolution is nothing but a scam.

What is it in the evolutionist psyche that enables you to ignore this fundamental flaw in your bogus theory...to live in denial of the fact that your bogus theory is full of holes and phoney??

Your ship is thinking pal. No matter how hard you try to plug the leaks with kneejerk bandaid explanations for your many failures, you're going under just like Kennedy at Chappaquidick...gurgle! gurgle! gurgle!

[whattajoke]

Did the forces of evolution exist only long enough to evolve man and then suddenly halt?

No... What makes you think it has?

[Coyoteman]

WHERE THEN ARE THE TRANSITIONAL FORMS??

Evidence of Evolutionary Transitions by Michael Benton.

From PatrickHenry's List-O-Links. But you said you don't want to go to that site.

But wait! There's more!

Post 661: Ichneumon's stunning post on transitionals. Also from PatrickHenry's List-O-Links.

[b_sharp]

"Your ship is thinking pal.

Yup!

[TheBrotherhood]

Excellent reposte.

Saved for later cut-and-paste as a response.