To: Mr. Silverback; CasearianDaoist; headsonpikes; beyond the sea; E.G.C.; Military family member; ...
“one predictable loser” in the aftermath of the [2005 Kelo] decision would be nonprofit groups such as churches. After all, even a run-down residence pays more taxes than a church or a homeless shelter.
8 posted on
01/23/2006 1:44:05 PM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I guess the Churches would make a nice target for any expansive (think Taxes) minded City Council and they usually occupy desirable Real estate.
TT
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
11 posted on
01/23/2006 3:04:33 PM PST by
E.G.C.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Kelo is BAD law, and IMO, unconstitutional law. While it would be a good thing for state and national lawmakers to write laws protecting citizens from Kelo, it would be better to strike it down once and for all. Local politicians are often a greedy and resourceful bunch.
12 posted on
01/23/2006 3:15:05 PM PST by
auboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson