No, it doesn't.
If a man had made that decision, no one would be exploiting that to make a male-bashing comment. That would be ridiculous. Exploiting the bad decision made by this individual woman to attack all women is just as ridiculous.
In case you haven't noticed (and your beliefs seem to show that you haven't), not all women are PC liberals. A lot of us (like me) believe that this is a bad decision regarding ammunition, not to mention the stupidity of the Geneva convention banning hollow-point ammunition.
Are you accepting applications?
The point (I hope) is that a "she" obviously was not a sniper (or really any kind of front line combat troop), so she made this mistake.
Whatever.
The "JAG" designation is more telling, and I like the Army lawyers I have met. They were just (with some notable exceptions) REMF.