"It will require a total investment of nearly 300 million yuan (37 million U.S. dollars), only one fifteenth to one twentieth the cost of similar devices being developed in the other parts of the world." I don't think I would want to be living in the hut next to this when they light it off, I firmly believe the old addage "You get what you pay for."
1 posted on
01/23/2006 6:14:43 AM PST by
Abathar
To: Abathar
If a device is developed that can withstand temperatures as high as 100 million Celsius degrees and control a deuterium-tritium reaction
Well, if that's all there is to it, what's taking so long?
To: Abathar
Silver Lining.... about time the ChiComs / Ruskies spend the dough and develop someting we can STEAL from than, after the decades of them leeching off of us.
3 posted on
01/23/2006 6:17:46 AM PST by
FreedomNeocon
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
To: Abathar
So China's bought into that perrennial money-pit of big science.
5 posted on
01/23/2006 6:20:21 AM PST by
bvw
To: Abathar
Gee, this is very good news...all of the worlds energy problems solved for only $37 million...AS IF
6 posted on
01/23/2006 6:20:24 AM PST by
johnandrhonda
(have you hugged your banjo today?)
To: Abathar
clean nuclear-fusion-based energy, .....and an enormous amount of energy can be obtained from a deuterium-tritium fusion reaction A total lie right here. Deuterium/tritium is NOT clean it produces an extra neutron that goes on to transmute all sorts of nasty isotopes in the surrounding structure.
7 posted on
01/23/2006 6:20:46 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: Abathar; chimera; ALOHA RONNIE; maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; Travis McGee
This shows that the artificially extreme low wages enforced throughout China is now giving the CCCP the ability to push the envelope of major scientific frontiers...faster than we currently are.
High-energy phsyics is only the visible tip of the iceberg here...one where they wish to broadcast their achievement (prospectively) and brag. Other areas where with great progress apparently are nano-technology, where they are more discreet and secretive in their successes...due to the strategic and military implications for reversing the playing field advantages we take for granted.
9 posted on
01/23/2006 6:23:20 AM PST by
Paul Ross
(Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
To: Abathar
Chinese... artificial sun... fusion reactor 1/15th the cost of similar devices...
what could possibly go wrong?
To: Abathar
Tokamak fusion device Whats new about that concept? - Seems I remember some departments at Bell Labs working on parts of that back in the 70s.
There are HUGE engineering obstacles to overcome.
They can throw 37 trillion at it, for all the good that it will do.
12 posted on
01/23/2006 6:25:40 AM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Abathar
They had one of those things in the movie, SPIDERMAN 2.
Very dangerous.
Maybe the great leader of North Korea will be on hand just in case something goes wrong.
Superheroes are rare on this side of the planet!!
15 posted on
01/23/2006 6:27:55 AM PST by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
To: Abathar
I don't see how that can call it a sun, if it's not up in the sky. Otherwise, it sounds very interesting.
16 posted on
01/23/2006 6:28:14 AM PST by
Sam Cree
(absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
To: Abathar
Hasn't there been a few Bond movies about this?
21 posted on
01/23/2006 6:31:49 AM PST by
Mrs. Shawnlaw
(Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
To: Abathar
now all that will be needed is to scale then down for warp drives and ones own personal 'Mr. Fusion' units.
22 posted on
01/23/2006 6:34:14 AM PST by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
To: Abathar
![](http://theamericaparty.org/cc2/layout8/curley15.jpg)
Looks like somebody already invented it.
23 posted on
01/23/2006 6:36:09 AM PST by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: Abathar
The good news is that they've developed an infinite, low cost power source. The bad news is that they've ignited the earth's atmosphere and incinerated the whole planet. Every major science advance has its little drawbacks.
29 posted on
01/23/2006 6:45:56 AM PST by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: Abathar
I don't think I would want to be living in the hut next to this when they light it off The Chinese have not shown themselves to be overly concerned about such things. For example, there is a village just downrange from their rocket launch facililty that gets hit by flaming debris from launch failures....
39 posted on
01/23/2006 7:06:06 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Abathar
Hey, imperialistic running dog lackeys of capitalist pigs, we got us some free energ....
![](http://webs.advance.com.ar/alegreto/fotos/explosion%20Nuclear1.jpg)
45 posted on
01/23/2006 7:23:09 AM PST by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Abathar
You are familiar with the cheap "made in China" toys, aren't you?
47 posted on
01/23/2006 7:28:09 AM PST by
GSlob
To: Abathar
brilliant marketing.
The hippie crowd will not really be able to confuse nuclear fussion with fission reactors.
Its a warm and fuzzy "sun" reactor.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson