[SampleMan]

In a parliamentary 38 party system, you would get to back your specific party, which would match your ideas 98% and represent 2% of the electorate. You would elect 2% of the PMs, who would then be firmly ignored by the majority party. Or at best, they would get an odd table scrap if their 2% were required to form a majority party. But, you could back them in clear conscience.

In a representative republic with two major parties, like ours, you pick a party closest to your own views and then attempt to influence the actions of that party.

In war, the parties which do the fighting get to help dictate terms. The more fight, the more clout. Staying home doesn't get you much clout.

I vote and support Republicans because they are closer to my positions than Democrats (what an understatement). When I get really upset at the GOP or segments of it, I give my money to individuals that I do support, and let the GOP know why my general support is waining (and I name names).

If you can get 25% of the electorate excited about your issues then I'm sure you will influence the GOP.

[RebelBanker]

SampleMan, outstanding reply!

I have been attempting in vain to convince many of the more hard-headed types around here that refusing to support Republicans helps elect Democrats for quite some time. Many people, including otherwise intelligent FReepers, can not seem to grasp the reality of how a two-party system works.

Mr. Hammer - Do you suppose you should support the most conservative party and/or candidate who can win elections? Otherwise you can support a fringer and help elect liberals. Your call.