[Designer]

In reality both were very poor candidates.

There, in a nutshell, is one of our most compelling arguments.

Thanks, WhiteGuy.

[WhiteGuy]

You are most welcome.

However to be fair, this fact is too obvious to take any real credit for.

[MACVSOG68]

There, in a nutshell, is one of our most compelling arguments.

Compelling would not be my choice of descriptors. Silly comes to mind. Had Perot not blathered his way to 19% of the vote, more than 90% of those who had voted for him would have voted for Bush. About 10% would have either sat it out or voted for Clinton. As for the 2000 election, those who voted Green would have voted for Gore not Bush if Nader did not run as effectively as he did. Gore would have won the election.

So those who talk of moving to the Constitution Party will simply be putting Hillary in the White House if you are successful in your campaign.